U.S. Code » Title 18 » Part PART II— CRIMINAL PROCEDURE › Chapter CHAPTER 235— APPEAL

18 U.S.C. § 3732

Taking of appeal; notice; time—(Rule)

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar
See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Taking appeal; notice, contents, signing; time, Rule 37(a).

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 845.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure was abrogated Dec. 4, 1967, eff. July 1, 1968, and is covered by Rule 3, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1996–2025 · leading case: United States v. Frias
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Frias (2008) ca2 “See 18 U.S.C. § 3732 . The time to appeal a criminal judgment, therefore, is set forth only in a court-prescribed rule of appellate procedure.”
United States v. Philip Martin Sadler (2007) ca9 “The only statutory reference to the timing of criminal appeals we uncovered is at 18 U.S.C. § 3732 . Entitled “Taking of appeal; notice; time — (Rule),” the provision lacks any substantive content.”
United States v. Reyes-Santiago (2015) ca1 “The section is entitled "Taking of appeal; notice; time—(Rule)” and it has a subheading in all capital letters: "SEE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE,” followed by the following text: “Talc-ing appeal; notice,, contents, signing; time, Rule 37(a).”
Emann v. Latture (2010) ca10 “2007) (“The only statutory reference to the timing of criminal appeals we uncovered is at 18 U.S.C. § 3732 . Entitled ‘Taking of appeal; notice; time-(Rule),’ the provision lacks any substantive content.”
United States v. Morris Fahnbulleh (2014) cadc “” Also, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3732 (a), venue for wire fraud lies in any jurisdiction to or from which the communication was transmitted.”
Dombroff v. Greene (In Re Dombroff) (1996) nysd “37, first enacted into statute at 18 U.S.C. § 3732 (1948). Section 3732, in turn, was repealed and Fed.”
United States v. Marietta Terabelian (2024) ca9 “See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3732 , 3742. But this court has clearly addressed her argument: “It has been settled for well over a century that an appellate court may dismiss the appeal of a defendant who is a fugitive from justice during the pendency of his appeal.”
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dashon Glen FULLER, Defendant-Appellant (1996) ca9 “§ 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3732 . We affirm the sentence.”
United States v. Honors (2025) ca10 “Exercising jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3732 (a), we affirm Mr. Honors’s conviction on Count 2, vacate the custodial no-contact order in its entirety, and vacate the portion of the supervised-release special condition prohibiting contact with his wife and biological children.”
United States v. Guillermo Benitez (2010) ca9 “We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3732 (a), and we affirm the district court.”
United States v. Sadler (2007) ca9 “Kontrick clearly states that only timeliness standards 6 The only statutory reference to the timing of criminal appeals we uncovered is at 18 U.S.C. § 3732 . Entitled “Taking of appeal; notice; time — (Rule),” the provision lacks any substantive content.”
United States v. Hinkson (2009) ca9 “HINKSON Counts 1 through 3 charged Hinkson with violating 18 U.S.C. § 3732 when he solicited Harding to torture and kill Cook, Hines, and Lodge in January 2003.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.