18 U.S.C. § 502
Postage and revenue stamps of foreign governments
Whoever forges, or counterfeits, or knowingly utters or uses any forged or counterfeit postage stamp or revenue stamp of any foreign government, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases, 1941–2018 · leading case: Newman v. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Newman v. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (2018)
“We need not dwell on the details of this journey; it suffices to say that Newman began as a pro se plaintiff, and later acquired counsel and filed the operative Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"), which pursued claims under SOX and the Employment Retirement Income Security Act…”
Michigan Bureau of Workers' Disability Compensation v. Chateaugay Corp. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.) (1987)
“18 U.S.C. § 502 (a) and (b). D. Michigan contends that Judge Lifland abused his discretion by disregarding evidence at the hearings indicating that workers’ compensation claimants in Michigan would not be compensated to the same extent as those in other states, because the SISF…”
Marchese v. United States (1942)
“§§ 191-194 and 18 U.S.C.A. § 502 are independent. As Judge McDuffie points out, they arose as separate bills in the Senate.”
RODRIGUEZ-VALENCIA v. Holder (2011)
“§ 1543 ; postage stamps, 18 U.S.C. § 502 ; and Post Office keys, 18 U.”
United States v. Cowan (1997)
“§ 501 (prohibiting forgery of domestic postage stamps); 18 U.S.C. § 502 (prohibiting forgery of foreign postage stamps); 18 U.”
Giugni v. United States (1942)
“The statute under which the indictment was laid, 18 U.S.C.A. § 502 , reads, so far as here material, as follows: “§ 502.”
Bersio v. United States (1941)
“217 , 221, 18 U.S.C.A. § 502 . The defendants are officers and members of the crew of the Italian vessels Pietro Campanella and Euro, lying in Baltimore harbor, and the Villarperosa, lying in the port of Wilmington, N.”
United States v. Saglietto (1941)
“The Substantive Offenses The statute ( 18 U.S.C.A. § 502 ; 40 Stat. 221 , Chap. 30, Title III, Sect.”
Hamburg-American Line v. United States (1948)
“The other vessels were damaged in American ports, and those taking part in the sabotage were prosecuted under 18 U.S.C.A. § 502 , and libels filed for forfeiture of the ships to the United States under 50 U.”
The Pietro Campanella (1942)
“In March 1941 the motive power of the two ships, then lying at anchor in the Port of Baltimore, was intentionally injured or destroyed by the masters and crew of the ships under orders from the Naval Attache of the Italian Embassy to this country.”
United States v. Pietro Campanella (1942)
“217 , 221, 18 U.S.C.A. § 502 . Upon the trial of the respective cases the defendants in most of them were convicted; and the judgments in some of the cases have now been affirmed by the Circuit Courts of Appeal of the Fourth and Fifth Circuits.”
United States v. The Pietro Campanella (1941)
“§§ 191-194 , in alleged consequence of the wilful injury to the ships and their machinery and equipment for which certain officers and seamen thereof had previously been convicted in this court under 18 U.S.C.A. § 502 , appeals in the latter cases being now pending.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.