18 U.S.C. § 655

Theft by bank examiner

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar

Whoever, being a bank examiner or assistant examiner, steals, or unlawfully takes, or unlawfully conceals any money, note, draft, bond, or security or any other property of value in the possession of any bank or banking institution which is a member of the Federal Reserve System, which is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which is a branch or agency of a foreign bank (as such terms are defined in paragraphs (1) and (3) of section 1(b) of the International Banking Act of 1978), or which is an organization operating under section 25 or section 25(a) 11 See References in Text note below. of the Federal Reserve Act, or from any safe deposit box in or adjacent to the premises of such bank, branch, agency, or organization, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both; but if the amount taken or concealed does not exceed $1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and shall be disqualified from holding office as a national bank examiner or Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation examiner.

This section shall apply to all public examiners and assistant examiners who examine member banks of the Federal Reserve System, banks the deposits of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, branches or agencies of foreign banks (as such terms are defined in paragraphs (1) and (3) of section 1(b) of the International Banking Act of 1978), or organizations operating under section 25 or section 25(a) ¹ of the Federal Reserve Act, whether appointed by the Comptroller of the Currency, by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, by a Federal Reserve Agent, by a Federal Reserve bank, or by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or appointed or elected under the laws of any State; but shall not apply to private examiners or assistant examiners employed only by a clearing-house association or by the directors of a bank.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 18 cases, 1930–2013 · leading case: United States v. Webber

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Webber (2008) ca7 “, 18 U.S.C. §§ 655 , 656, 1003, 1025. The above code sections and those like them all include the same structural elements: a lengthy primary clause describing certain illegal conduct and providing for felony punishment thereof; a semicolon; and, finally, a second clause —…”

United States v. Albert Tupone (2006) ca3 “, 18 U.S.C. §§ 655 , 656, 1003, 1025. The above code sections and those like them all include the same structural elements: a lengthy primary clause describing certain illegal conduct and providing for felony punishment thereof; a semicolon; and, finally, a second clause—…”

John Doe v. William H. Webster, Director, Fbi (1979) cadc “, 18 U.S.C. § 655 (1976) (bank examiners convicted of theft); 18 U.”

President of United States ex rel. Caputo v. Kelly (1937) nysd · cites it 6× “” 18 U.S.C. § 655 ( 18 U.S.C.A. § 655 ). They clearly show that there was an indictment found against the petitioner in the French court charging petitioner with the crimes on which his extradition is sought.”

United States v. Bernette Floyd Jackson (1985) ca4 “§ 654 (1982) (“money or property”), 18 U.S.C. § 655 (1982) (“money, note, draft, bond, or security or any other property of value”).”

United States v. Donald E. Meadows (1979) ca5 “Although it is clear that Meadows made no false inducements to obtain the extra paychecks initially, his conduct in continuing to pick them up with knowledge of the obvious error came sufficiently within the broad sweep of 18 U.S.C. § 655 to go to the jury. IV. RULE 408 — OFFER…”

United States v. Clyde R. Goad (1974) ca8 “§ 654 , 18 U.S.C. § 655 , 18 U.S.C. § 656 , 18 U.”

United States Ex Rel. Klein v. Mulligan (1931) ca2 “The depositions of Stacy, Hedley, Turner, and Cockrane relate the experiences of four such victims, and from the deposition of Newman, an examiner in the Department of the Official Receiver in Companies Liquidation, it appears that large numbers of clients were induced to buy…”

Robert F. Goeller and Jeanette M. Goeller v. United States (2013) uscfc “, 18 U.S.C. §§ 655 (theft by bank examiner); 656 (theft, embezzlement, or misapplication by bank officer or employee); 664 (theft or embezzlement from employee benefit plan); 665 (theft or embezzlement from employment and training funds); 666 (theft concerning programs receiving…”

Collier v. Vaccaro (1931) ca4 “The statute in question provides: “Evidence on hearing. In all cases where any depositions, warrants, or other papers or copies thereof shall be offered in evidence upon the hearing of any extradition ease under this chapter, such depositions, warrants, and other papers, or the…”

Cleugh v. Strakosch (1940) ca9 “9 The copies were authenticated in accordance with § 5271 of the Revised Statutes, 18 U.S.C.A. § 655 , 10 and were received in evidence without objection.”

United States v. Overbay (1977) tned “capacity with, any agency receiving financial assistance under the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 embezzles, wilfully misapplies, steals, or obtains by fraud any of the moneys, funds, assets, or property which are the subject of a grant or contract of…”

Show all 18 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.