19 U.S.C. § 2350
Civil actions
In providing technical and financial assistance under this part the Secretary may sue and be sued in any court of record of a State having general jurisdiction or in any United States district court, and jurisdiction is conferred upon such district court to determine such controversies without regard to the amount in controversy; but no attachment, injunction, garnishment, or other similar process, mesne or final, shall be issued against him or his property. Nothing in this section shall be construed to except the activities pursuant to sections 2343 and 2344 of this title from the application of sections 516, 547, and 2679 of title 28.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1977–2020 · leading case: Molton, Allen & Williams, Inc. v. Harris, 436 F. Supp. 853 (D.D.C. 1977).
Molton, Allen & Williams, Inc. v. Harris, 436 F. Supp. 853 (D.D.C. 1977). “§ 634 (b)(1) (Administrator of Small Business Administration), 19 U.S.C. § 2350 (Secretary of the Treasury), 39 U.”
United States v. Krieger, 773 F. Supp. 580 (S.D.N.Y. 1991). “If he does so, the parties are instructed to fully substantiate their respective positions on the issue of this court’s power to assert subject matter jurisdiction over the counterclaim, giving particular attention to the Tucker Act, 28 U.”
Related Indus., Inc. v. United States, 2 Cl. Ct. 517 (Ct. Cl. 1983). “1983) (Commodity Credit Corporation); 19 U.S.C. § 2350 (1976) (Secretary of Commerce); 20 U.”
Citizens Marine Nat'l Bank v. United States Dep't of Com., Econ. Dev. Admin., 854 F.2d 223 (7th Cir. 1988). “The bank’s complaint based jurisdiction on 19 U.S.C. § 2350 , which empowers the Secretary of Commerce to sue or be sued, for any amount of money, with respect to claims arising from the Trade Act of 1974, thus enabling this suit to be maintained notwithstanding the Tucker Act.”
Camelot Banquet Rooms, Inc. v. Carranza (E.D. Wis. 2020). “These statutes allow the agency to be sued but specifically provide that “no attachment, injunction, garnishment, or other similar process, mesne or final, shall be issued against the [agency] or [its] property.”
J.R. Schuster LLC v. United States Small Bus. Admin. (E.D. Wis. 2020). “These statutes allow the agency to be sued but specifically provide that “no attachment, injunction, garnishment, or other similar process, mesne or final, shall be issued against the [agency] or [its] property.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.