19 U.S.C. § 58
Repealed. Pub. L. 95–410, title II, § 214(a), Oct. 3, 1978, 92 Stat. 904
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1939–2021 · leading case: Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. United States, 165 F.3d 898 (Fed. Cir. 1999).
Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. United States, 165 F.3d 898 (Fed. Cir. 1999). “1 See 19 U.S.C. §§ 58 (a), (b)(10) (1993) (authorizing full and reduced merchandise processing fees respectively).”
Carriso, Inc. v. United States, 106 F.2d 707 (9th Cir. 1939). “See 19 U.S.C.A. § 58 , 46 U.S.C.A. § 331 , and historical notes thereto.”
Puget Sound Freight Lines v. United States, 36 C.C.P.A. 70 (C.C.P.A. 1949). “The assessments were levied pursuant to section 2654 of the Revised Statutes, 19U.S.C. §58. Appellants, alleged in their protests that such assessments were illegally exacted *72 because the act of March 3, 1897, § 9, 29 Stat.”
Border Line Transp. Co. v. Haas, 128 F.2d 192 (9th Cir. 1942). “The Collector took the position that 19 U.S.C.A. § 58 controls. This statute has been modified by the statute of 1870, c.”
NetJets Aviation, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Agric. (S.D. Ohio 2021). “Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) under 19 U.S.C. § 58 (c). (Id., ¶¶ 10–22). In 2020, CBP audited Plaintiffs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.