19 U.S.C. § 58
Repealed. Pub. L. 95–410, title II, § 214(a), Oct. 3, 1978, 92 Stat. 904
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1939–2021 · leading case: Alcan Aluminum Corporation v. United States
Alcan Aluminum Corporation v. United States (1999)
“1 See 19 U.S.C. §§ 58 (a), (b)(10) (1993) (authorizing full and reduced merchandise processing fees respectively).”
Carriso, Inc. v. United States (1939)
“…paragraphs of § 2654. See 19 U.S.C.A. § 58 , 46 U.S.C.A. § 331 , and historical notes thereto. Commonly known as the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act. <p id="”
Puget Sound Freight Lines v. United States (1949)
“The assessments were levied pursuant to section 2654 of the Revised Statutes, 19U.S.C. §58. Appellants, alleged in their protests that such assessments were illegally exacted *72 because the act of March 3, 1897, § 9, 29 Stat.”
Border Line Transp. Co. v. Haas (1942)
“The Collector took the position that 19 U.S.C.A. § 58 controls. This statute has been modified by the statute of 1870, c.”
NetJets Aviation, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Agriculture (2021)
“Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) under 19 U.S.C. § 58 (c).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.