2 U.S.C. § 1551

Baseline study of costs and benefits

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 2 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) In general

No later than 18 months after March 22, 1995, the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (hereafter in this subchapter referred to as the “Advisory Commission”), in consultation with the Director, shall complete a study to examine the measurement and definition issues involved in calculating the total costs and benefits to State, local, and tribal governments of compliance with Federal law.

(b) ConsiderationsThe study required by this section shall consider—(1) the feasibility of measuring indirect costs and benefits as well as direct costs and benefits of the Federal, State, local, and tribal relationship; and(2) how to measure both the direct and indirect benefits of Federal financial assistance and tax benefits to State, local, and tribal governments.(Pub. L. 104–4, title III, § 301, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 67.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: Sch. Dist. v. Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Educ., 512 F.3d 252 (6th Cir. 2008).
Sch. Dist. v. Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Educ., 512 F.3d 252 (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “" 2 U.S.C. § 1551 (a). The primary definition found at § 658(5)(A) applies instead to all provisions designed "to end the imposition, in the absence of full consideration by Congress, of Federal mandates on State, local, and tribal governments without adequate Federal funding,…”
Pontiac Sch. Dist v. Sec US Dept Ed (6th Cir. 2008). “” 2 U.S.C. § 1551 (a). The primary definition found at § 658(5)(A) applies instead to all provisions designed “to end the imposition, in the absence of full consideration by Congress, of Federal mandates on No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.