U.S. Code » Title 21 » Chapter CHAPTER 7— PRACTICE OF PHARMACY AND SALE OF POISONS IN CONSULAR DISTRICTS IN CHINA

21 U.S.C. § 202

Certain classes of persons and corporations excepted; insecticides

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 21 CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing in section 201 of this title shall be construed to interfere with any recognized and reputable practitioner of medicine, dentistry, or veterinary surgery in the compounding of his own prescriptions, or to prevent him from supplying to his patients such medicines as he may deem proper, except as hereinafter provided; nor with the exclusively wholesale business of any person, firm, or corporation whose permanent allegiance is due to the United States dealing and licensed as pharmacists, or having in their employ at least one person who is so licensed, except as hereinafter provided; nor with the sale by persons, firms, or corporations whose permanent allegiance is due to the United States other than pharmacists of poisonous substances sold exclusively for use in the arts, or as insecticides, when such substances are sold in unbroken packages bearing labels having plainly printed upon them the name of the contents, the word “Poison”, when practicable the name of at least one suitable antidote, and the name and address of the vender.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2012–2013 · leading case: Evans v. Thomas Jefferson Univ., 81 A.3d 1062 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Evans v. Thomas Jefferson Univ., 81 A.3d 1062 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013). · cites it 2× “Evans had also originally contended that Vandegrift's conduct violated 21 U.S.C. § 202 . (Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories, Supp.”
Diamond Offshore Co. v. Survival Sys. Int'l, Inc., 902 F. Supp. 2d 912 (S.D. Tex. 2012). “(quoting 21 U.S.C. § 202 ). The drug manufacturer argued that there was a conflict because it could not comply with both the federal label requirements and state-law duties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.