21 U.S.C. § 379a
Presumption of existence of jurisdiction
In any action to enforce the requirements of this chapter respecting a device, tobacco product, food, drug, or cosmetic the connection with interstate commerce required for jurisdiction in such action shall be presumed to exist.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1984–2013 · leading case: United States v. Blue Ribbon Smoked Fish, Inc.
United States v. Blue Ribbon Smoked Fish, Inc. (2001)
“” 21 U.S.C. § 379a. The government, in addition, has submitted evidence to establish that Blue Ribbon receives raw fish to be processed from Norway, Chile, and the Faroe Islands.”
United States v. Torigian Laboratories, Inc. (1984)
“21 U.S.C. § 379a. In addition, the government has established beyond a reasonable doubt, by direct testimony and documentary evidence, that defendants caused the lenses involved in the adulteration and misbranding charges in counts 7 through 18 to be delivered for introduction…”
United States v. Chung's Products LP (2013)
“21 U.S.C. § 379a (“In any action to enforce the requirements of [the FDCA] respecting a food .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.