25 U.S.C. § 677aa

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1965–2012 · leading case: Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee
Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee (1965) waed “868 , (25 U.S.C. § 677aa) relating to the Ute Indians, divides all such Indians into “full-blood” meaning those having an excess of one-half Indian blood, and “mixed-blood”, and provides for separate and distinct rights and treatments of the two classes of Indians.”
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation v. Ute Distribution Corp. (2012) ca10 “” 25 U.S.C. § 677aa. The Tribe relies primarily on two cases for its position that the Qualification Amendment was an unreasonable restriction on what the Tribe calls its right to nominate a candidate of its choice to be a UDC director.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.