25 U.S.C. § 701

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1965–1986 · leading case: United States v. Arnold Gemmill, 535 F.2d 1145 (9th Cir. 1976).
United States v. Arnold Gemmill, 535 F.2d 1145 (9th Cir. 1976). “( 25 U.S.C. § 701 .) Final determinations of the Commission are appealable, within three months, to the Court of Claims and then to the Supreme Court.”
Navajo Tribe v. United States, 218 Ct. Cl. 11 (Ct. Cl. 1978). “§ 1500 (1970) could bar a claimant from filing both a "course-of-conduct” or "continuing policy” claim in the Commission (if the claim reached beyond August 13, 1946) and a parallel post-August 1946 suit in this court on the separate "wrongs”, but under the suggested analysis…”
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United States, 11 Cl. Ct. 221 (Ct. Cl. 1986). “” At 25 U.S.C. § 701 , the Commission was authorized to send to the head of each tribe and band an explanation of the Indian Claims Act and to ask for a statement of all claims.”
Red Lake & Pembina Bands v. Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, 173 Ct. Cl. 928 (Ct. Cl. 1965). “” Section 10, 25 U.S.C. § 701 , allows a claim to be presented “by any member of an Indian tribe, band, or other identifiable group of Indians as the representative of all its members” (with an exception for groups with a tribal organization).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.