Notes of Decisions
Freedom From Religion Found., Inc. v. Geithner, 644 F.3d 836 (9th Cir. 2011).
· cites it 2× “26 U.S.C. § 107 . FFRF seeks a declaration that the challenged statutes are unconstitutional and an injunction forbidding the defendants from “continuing to grant or allow tax benefits under sections 107 and 265(a)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code and the corresponding sections…”
Freedom From Religion Found., Inc. v. Lew, 773 F.3d 815 (7th Cir. 2014).
· cites it 3× “” 26 U.S.C. § 107 . The plaintiffs conceded in the district court that they did not have standing to challenge § 107(1), which applies to in-kind housing provided to a minister, but argued that they did have standing to challenge § 107(2), which applies to rental allowanees paid…”
Annie Gaylor v. Steven Mnuchin, 919 F.3d 420 (7th Cir. 2019).
· cites it 3× “We must decide whether excluding housing allowances from ministers' taxable income is a law "respecting an establishment of religion" in violation of the First Amendment.”
Gaylor v. Mnuchin, 278 F. Supp. 3d 1081 (W.D. Wis. 2017).
· cites it 3× “At issue is the constitutionality of 26 U.S.C. § 107 (2), which excludes from the gross incomp of a “minister of the gospel” a “rental allowance paid to him as part of his compensation.”
Freedom from Religion Found., Inc. v. Lew, 983 F. Supp. 2d 1051 (W.D. Wis. 2013).
· cites it 4× “§ 702 , contending that certain federal income tax exemptions received by “ministers of the gospel” under 26 U.S.C. § 107 violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment and the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment.”
Hofferbert v. Marshall Et Ux, 200 F.2d 648 (4th Cir. 1952).
· cites it 4× “§§ 51 (b) and 12(d) and computed the tax in accordance with the formula of 26 U.S.C. § 107 (a). The examining officer of the Bureau of Interna] Revenue disallowed the return in so far as it accounted for one-half of this item as income of the wife and held that the entire item…”
Libhart v. Copeland, 949 S.W.2d 783 (Tex. App. 1997).
“26 U.S.C.A. § 107 (West 1988). Appellees elicited other testimony from Libhart about the parsonage without objection.”
Dickman v. Sch. Dist. No. 62c, 366 P.2d 533 (Or. 1961).
· cites it 2× “[16] 26 USC § 501 (c)(2), (3), 501(d) (1958) (exemption from income tax of religious organizations and corporations); 26 USC § 107 (1958) (exclusion from gross income of a rental allowance or home given a minister); 26 USC § 170 (1958) (individual taxpayer's deduction for…”
Sloane v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 188 F.2d 254 (6th Cir. 1951).
· cites it 2× “hat even if the amount should be considered ordinary income as compensation for services, the services extended over a period in excess of sixty months and more than seventy-five percent of the total compensation was received in one year, in consequence of which petitioner…”
Jay Carter Joan H. Carter v. United States, 973 F.2d 1479 (9th Cir. 1992).
“See 26 U.S.C. § 107 . Joan Carter, who is employed, donates to the PPULC fifty percent of her income, the maximum deductible contribution to a qualifying religious organization.”
Douglas Page v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 58 F.3d 1342 (8th Cir. 1995).
“The tax court did not err in disallowing Page a parsonage allowance under 26 U.S.C. § 107 for the rental value of the Valley View property.”
26 U.S.C. § 107(a): 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.