Notes of Decisions
United States v. Kottwitz, 614 F.3d 1241 (11th Cir. 2010).
· cites it 2× “" 26 U.S.C. § 317 (a). [T]he term "dividend" means any distribution of property made by a corporation to its shareholders(1) out of its [retained] earnings and profits .”
Eva D. Bradbury v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 298 F.2d 111 (1st Cir. 1962).
“Under Section 317(b) of the Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 317 (b), a redemption of stock is defined as an acquisition by a corporation of its stock from a shareholder in exchange for property irrespective of whetber or not the stock is cancelled, retired or retained as treasury stock.”
United States v. R. Perry Collins, (Two Cases), 300 F.2d 821 (1st Cir. 1962).
“Indeed, in this situation, since the taxpayer can control the matter, so long as he insures that the payment for the stock does not exceed fair market value, it would be unusual for the acquiring corporation ever to have a reduction of surplus unless the acquired stock was…”
Radnitz v. United States, 187 F. Supp. 952 (S.D.N.Y. 1960).
“According to Section 317 (a), 26 U.S.C.A. § 317 (a), the term “property” comprehends money.”
Miller v. United States, 404 F. Supp. 284 (E.D.N.Y 1975).
“Under the 1954 Internal Revenue Code, money and any other property except stock or stock rights in the distributing corporation are treated as property distributed by a corporation to the shareholder.”
United States v. Coghlan (In Re Coghlan), 227 B.R. 304 (D. Ariz. 1998).
· cites it 2× “Debtor asserts that she retained a property interest in the levied account receivable even after the money had been collected by the IRS, and cites to 26 U.S.C. § 317 (a) for the proposition that the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) defines property for all purposes under the code as…”
Baumer v. United States, 580 F.2d 871 (5th Cir. 1978).
· cites it 2× “26 U.S.C. § 317 (a). In accordance with this broad definition of property, dividends may be “in cash or in kind, and may also result when the corporation makes a ‘bargain sale’ of its property to the shareholder at less than fair market value.”
26 U.S.C. § 317(a): 1 case
United States v. Coghlan (In Re Coghlan), 227 B.R. 304 (D. Ariz. 1998).
“Debtor asserts that she retained a property interest in the levied account receivable even after the money had been collected by the IRS, and cites to 26 U.S.C. § 317 (a) for the proposition that the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) defines property for all purposes under the code as…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.