Notes of Decisions
Carroll Eugene Singleton, & Sheila Singleton v. United States, 128 F.3d 833 (4th Cir. 1997).
· cites it 4× “When the IRS realized its mistake, in 1991, the government argued, it properly made a “supplemental assessment,” pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6204 , for the full amount of tax reported on the Singletons’ original return.”
Clark v. United States, 63 F.3d 83 (1st Cir. 1995).
“26 U.S.C. § 6204 . *85 Once it makes an assessment of a taxpayer's tax liability for a given year, the IRS generally has sixty days to issue a notice and demand for payment to the taxpayer, 26 U.”
Francis H. Ameel, Adm'r D.B.N. Est. of Mary E. Ameel v. United States, 426 F.2d 1270 (6th Cir. 1970).
“The ability of the Government to assert additional assessments however, is granted to it by statute, Section 6204(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. § 6204 (a) (1964), and may be cut off only by applicable statutory limitations on further assessment.”
Kurio v. United States, 429 F. Supp. 42 (S.D. Tex. 1970).
“26 U.S.C. § 6204 . A commentator has noted: The principle of self-assessment by the taxpayer would collapse if the Commissioner were completely at liberty to reject the taxpayer’s statement of income simply because such statement of income does not approximate the average income…”
United States v. Vorachek, 563 F.2d 884 (8th Cir. 1977).
“The supplemental assessments were made pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6204 (a). On August 23,1976, a tax assessment of $7,163.”
Allan v. United States, 386 F. Supp. 499 (N.D. Tex. 1975).
“26 U.S.C. § 6204 (a): (a) General rule. — The Secretary or his delegate may, at any time within the period prescribed for assessment, make a supplemental assessment whenever it is ascertained that any assessment is imperfect or incomplete in any material respect.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.