U.S. Code » Title 26 » Subtitle Subtitle H— Financing of Presidential Election Campaigns › Chapter CHAPTER 96— PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY MATCHING PAYMENT ACCOUNT

26 U.S.C. § 9031

Short title

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 26 CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter may be cited as the “Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act”.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1975–2024 · leading case: Federal Election Commission v. NRA Political Victory Fund
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jones v. Federal Election Commission (2024) dcd “, and the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, 26 U.S.C. § 9031 et seq.”
Jill Stein v. FEC (2023) cadc “26 U.S.C. §§ 9031–42. Under the Act, candidates may receive funds to match individual contributions up to $250.”
Schonberg v. Federal Election Commission (2011) dcd “, or the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, 26 U.S.C. § 9031 et seq.”
Green Party of CT v. Garfield (2008) ctd “…Finally, Subtitle H provides funding to use in presidential primary campaigns. 26 U.S.C. §§ 9031 , et seq. To be eligible for primary funds, a participating candidate must raise at least 5,000 dollars in each of 20 states in increments of 250 dollars or less per person,…”
Democratic National Committee v. Federal Election Commission (2008) dcd “The DNC alleges that Senator John McCain’s presidential campaign has violated the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, 26 U.S.C. § 9031 et seq., “by failing to comply with the statutory spending limits and other requirements imposed on candidates for President who…”
Hooker v. Federal Election Commission (2000) tnmd “The plaintiff challenges two laws regarding campaign funds for the presidential and congressional elections — the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, 26 U.S.C. § 9031 , et seq., and the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act, 26 U.”
Public Office Corporation,appellants v. Clinton for President Committee,appellees (1999) cadc “The Committee received federal election campaign funds under the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act (“PPMPAA”), 26 U.S.C. § 9031 et seq.”
Federal Election Commission v. Automated Business Services (1995) nysd “, and the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act (“the Matching Payment Act”), 26 U.S.C. § 9031 et seq.”
Michael S. Dukakis v. Federal Election Commission (1995) cadc · cites it 2× “Petitioners argue the Commission is time-barred from imposing this repayment obligation on them, pursuant to the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, 26 U.S.C. § 9031 et seq.”
Federal Election Commission v. NRA Political Victory Fund (1994) scotus · cites it 2× “(Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act), 26 U. S. C. § 9031 et seq. (Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act).”
Vote Choice, Inc. v. Di Stefano (1993) rid “§ 17-25-19 with 26 U.S.C. § 9031 et seq.”
Lyndon H. Larouche Larouche Democratic Campaign '88 v. Federal Election Commission (1993) cadc “LaRouche and the LaRouche Democratic Campaign ’88 (“petitioners”) of the Commission’s “final determination” that petitioners must repay $151,259 obtained pursuant to the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, 26 U.S.C. §§ 9031 et seq.”
Show all 18 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.