U.S. Code » Title 28 » Part PART I— ORGANIZATION OF COURTS › Chapter CHAPTER 3— COURTS OF APPEALS

28 U.S.C. § 10

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar
As used in sections 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of this Act, the term—“(1) ‘former fifth circuit’ means the fifth judicial circuit of the United States as in existence on the day before the effective date of this Act [Oct. 1, 1981];“(2) the term ‘new fifth circuit’ means the fifth judicial circuit of the United States established by the amendment made by section 2(2) of this Act [amending item relating to the fifth circuit in this section]; and“(3) the term ‘eleventh circuit’ means the eleventh judicial circuit of the United States established by the amendment made by section 2(3) of this Act [adding item relating to the eleventh circuit in this section].”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2020–2025 · leading case: Patsalis v. Shinn
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Patsalis v. Shinn (2020) azd “140, 149 (1985); see also 28 U.S.C. § 10 636(b)(1) (“[T]he court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report 11 and recommendation] to which objection is made.”
Garza v. Shinn (2021) azd “See 28 U.S.C. § 10 2254(b)(2) (allowing denial of unexhausted claims on the merits); Lambrix v.”
Garcia v. Unknown Parties (2024) azd “" 28 U.S.C. § 10 1915(e)(2)(B). 11 12 III. General Requirements 13 A complaint is to contain a "short and plain statement of the claim showing that the 14 pleader is entitled to relief[.”
Clarence Leonard Hearns v. Kathleen Allison (2021) cacd “There is no indication in the record that Petitioner 8 has obtained permission from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to file a second or successive 9 petition.”
Fuller v. UMC Medical University Medical Facility (2020) nvd “For example, courts have discretion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 10 1915(e)(1), to “request” that an attorney represent indigent civil litigants upon a showing of 11 “exceptional circumstances.”
Lamb v. Smith and Wamsley PLLC (2024) azd “Indeed, 28 U.S.C. § 10 1332 "requires complete diversity – no plaintiff may be a citizen of the same state as any 11 defendant.”
Thrasher 279825 v. Vannorstran (2025) azd “28 U.S.C. § 10 1915A(b)(1)–(2). November 20, 2024, Order (Doc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.