28 U.S.C. § 101
Massachusetts
Massachusetts constitutes one judicial district.
Court shall be held at Boston, New Bedford, Springfield, and Worcester.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 46
cases (21 in the last 5 years), 1928–2025 · leading case: United States v. Parker, 103 F.2d 857 (3rd Cir. 1939).
United States v. Parker, 103 F.2d 857 (3rd Cir. 1939). “The appellants next moved under Section 40 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. § 101 , 28 U.S.C.A. § 101 , to have the trial held in Burlington County, New Jersey, where the offense was alleged to have been committed.”
Arrowsmith v. Lemberg Law, LLC (In re Health Diagnostics Lab'y, Inc.), 571 B.R. 182 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2017). “See 28 U.S.C. § 101 (54). The defined term has been interpreted broadly to encompass an array of transactions in which the debtor may have engaged.”
Commonwealth v. Armstrong, 897 N.E.2d 105 (Mass. App. Ct. 2008). “See also 28 U.S.C. § 101 (2000). Article 13 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights provides that, “[i]n criminal prosecutions, the verification of facts in the vicinity where they happen, is one of the greatest securities of the life, liberty, and property of the citizen.”
Teter v. Glass Onion, Inc., 723 F. Supp. 2d 1138 (W.D. Mo. 2010). “” 28 U.S.C. § 101 . GOI does not dispute that it created digital images of Teter’s copyrighted works.”
In re Jefferson Cnty., 474 B.R. 228 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2012). “Although the structure of the warrants limits recourse to the revenues of the sewer system after deducting certain operating expenses and other sums which is nonrecourse against the full faith and credit of the County, a non-user fee or assessment would still be for payment of a…”
Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Icahn (In Re Trans World Airlines, Inc.), 278 B.R. 42 (Bankr. D. Del. 2002). “28 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq. is hereinafter referred to as "§ 15 .”
Son v. Coal Equity, Inc. (In Re Centennial Coal, Inc.), 282 B.R. 140 (Bankr. D. Del. 2002). “That motion has been fully briefed and is pending before the Court. While Plaintiff objects to the instant motion to transfer venue, Coal Equity does not.”
United States v. Gruberg, 493 F. Supp. 234 (S.D.N.Y. 1979). “1100 , formerly codified at 28 U.S.C. § 101 (1940 ed.), now codified at 18 U.”
Charles W. Ross Builder, Inc. v. Olsen Fine Home Bldg., LLC, 977 F. Supp. 2d 567 (E.D. Va. 2013). “’s (“Plaintiff’) Amended Complaint, which alleges violations of the: (1) Federal Copyright Act, 28 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.; (2) Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.”
Hale v. United States, 25 F.2d 430 (8th Cir. 1928). “Hale to Transfer the Trial of Said Cause as Provided in Section 40 of the Judicial Code (28 USCA § 101). “Comes no-w the defendants, John Ramsey and W.”
Schwinn Plan Comm. v. AFS Cycle & Co. (In Re Schwinn Bicycle Co.), 190 B.R. 599 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1995). “Section 1412 provides that “[a] district court may transfer a case or proceeding under Title 11, 28 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., to a district court for another district, in the interest of justice or for the convenience of the parties.”
Charles W. Ross Builder, Inc. v. Olsen Fine Home Bldg., LLC, 827 F. Supp. 2d 607 (E.D. Va. 2011). “’s (“Plaintiff’) Amended Complaint, which alleges violations of the Federal Copyright Act, 28 U.S.C. § 101 , et seq., the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.