U.S. Code » Title 28 » Part PART II— DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › Chapter CHAPTER 31— THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

28 U.S.C. § 1055

EXPENSES OF TASK FORCES.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)Appropriations and Reimbursements Procedure.—Beginning in fiscal year 1990, the Attorney General in his budget shall submit a separate appropriations request for expenses relating to all Federal agencies participating in the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces. Such appropriations shall be made to the Department of Justice’s Interagency Law Enforcement Appropriation Account for the Attorney General to make reimbursements to the involved agencies as necessary.“(b)Enhancement of Field Activities.—The appropriations and reimbursements procedure described under subsection (a) shall—“(1) provide for the flexibility of the Task Forces which is vital to success;“(2) permit Federal law enforcement resources to be shifted in response to changing patterns of organized criminal drug activities;“(3) permit the Attorney General to reallocate resources among the organizational components of the Task Forces and between regions without undue delay; and“(4) ensure that the Task Forces function as a unit, without the competition for resources among the participating agencies that would undermine the overall effort.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2024 · leading case: Kahn v. Kahn
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kahn v. Kahn (1992) nysd · cites it 2× “See 28 U.S.C. § 1055 (a). A participating spouse is not permitted to elect to waive the qualified joint and survivor annuity option unless the non-participant spouse consents in writing to waive JSA benefits.”
Schantz v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. (In Re Schantz) (1998) nynd “28 U.S.C. § 1055 (c)(2). See Kahn v. Kahn, 801 F.”
Whetstone v. Howard University (2024) dcd “” 28 U.S.C. § 1055 (d)(1)(B). Defendants do not explain why that definition would not constrain SLA-to-JSA conversions under the Plan, and many courts have allowed claims on the basis of this provision to proceed past a motion to dismiss.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.