West Virginia is divided into two judicial districts to be known as the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia.
Northern District
(a) The Northern District comprises the counties of Barbour, Berkeley, Braxton, Brooke, Calhoun, Doddridge, Gilmer, Grant, Hampshire, Hancock, Hardy, Harrison, Jefferson, Lewis, Marion, Marshall, Mineral, Monongalia, Morgan, Ohio, Pendleton, Pleasants, Pocahontas, Preston, Randolph, Ritchie, Taylor, Tucker, Tyler, Upshur, Webster, and Wetzel.
Court for the Northern District shall be held at Clarksburg, Elkins, Fairmont, Martinsburg, and Wheeling.
Southern District
(b) The Southern District comprises the counties of Boone, Cabell, Clay, Fayette, Greenbrier, Jackson, Kanawha, Lincoln, Logan, McDowell, Mason, Mercer, Mingo, Monroe, Nicholas, Putnam, Raleigh, Roane, Summers, Wayne, Wirt, Wood, and Wyoming.
Court for the Southern District shall be held at Beckley, Bluefield, Charleston, Huntington, Lewisburg, and Parkersburg.
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Sean Michael Grier, 449 F.3d 558 (3rd Cir. 2006).
“Grier argues that the District Court erred in applying a preponderance standard to facts relevant to the four-level enhancement, in finding that he had committed aggravated assault under Pennsylvania law, and in imposing sentence without fully articulating its consideration of…”
United States v. Gordon, 168 F.3d 1222 (10th Cir. 1999).
“Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 129 '.. We affirm. I. Background On January 11,1997, at approximately 9:00 p.”
United States v. Gary Steven Florence, 456 F.2d 46 (4th Cir. 1972).
· cites it 2× “28 U.S.C.A. § 129 . This meant that the jury panel, from which the grand jury which indicted him and the petit jury which convicted him were drawn, was chosen from the eleven counties comprising the Elkins “division,” as set forth in the Jury Selection Plan for the Northern…”
Woodruff v. Hamilton Twp. Pub. Schs., 305 F. App'x 833 (3rd Cir. 2009).
“The District Court laid out for the Woodruffs the various options for continuing with the instant civil action, including obtaining an attorney or continuing with their claims only. The Woodruffs elected to file an amended complaint which purported to raise them claims only.”
Roy Day v. Daniel Toner, 530 F. App'x 118 (3rd Cir. 2013).
“We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 129 . We review a district court’s decision to dismiss a complaint as frivolous or malicious for abuse of discretion.”
Nancy Johnson v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., 969 F.2d 1082 (D.C. Cir. 1992).
“She chose instead to move for reconsideration, requesting that the district court dismiss her complaint, or that it certify its order finding no jurisdiction for interlocutory review under 28 U.S.C. § 129 (b). While her complaint was pending in the district court, Mrs.”
David Brown v. City of Ecorse, 322 F. App'x 443 (6th Cir. 2009).
“As to the second, Brown contends that there was no rational basis related to legitimate state concerns for denying his application.”
United States v. Roy Harman, 349 F.2d 316 (4th Cir. 1965).
“, so far as pertinent, provides: ““ * * the prosecution shall be had in a district in which the offense was committed, but if the district consists of two or more divisions the trial shall be had in a division in which the offense was committed.”
United States v. Christopher Steele, 664 F. App'x 260 (3rd Cir. 2016).
“Finally, he found that any harm from the prosecution’s brief reference to Steele’s ex-partner was cured by the court’s jury instructions before and after closing arguments.”
Penoro v. Rederi A/B Disa, 376 F.2d 125 (2d Cir. 1967).
“440 (1935), the Supreme Court first considered the problem of stays of court proceedings under Title 28 U.S.C. § 129 , predecessor to § 1292(a) (1).”
Yigal Bosch v. Frost Nat'l Bank, 494 F. App'x 463 (5th Cir. 2012).
“2011) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 129 ). We review actions of the district court in its appellate role for an abuse of discretion, Zer-Ilan v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.