28 U.S.C. § 1360

State civil jurisdiction in actions to which Indians are parties

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Each of the States listed in the following table shall have jurisdiction over civil causes of action between Indians or to which Indians are parties which arise in the areas of Indian country listed opposite the name of the State to the same extent that such State has jurisdiction over other civil causes of action, and those civil laws of such State that are of general application to private persons or private property shall have the same force and effect within such Indian country as they have elsewhere within the State:

State of	Indian country affected
Alaska	All Indian country within the State.
California	All Indian country within the State.
Minnesota	All Indian country within the State, except the Red Lake Reservation.
Nebraska	All Indian country within the State.
Oregon	All Indian country within the State, except the Warm Springs Reservation.
Wisconsin	All Indian country within the State.

(b) Nothing in this section shall authorize the alienation, encumbrance, or taxation of any real or personal property, including water rights, belonging to any Indian or any Indian tribe, band, or community that is held in trust by the United States or is subject to a restriction against alienation imposed by the United States; or shall authorize regulation of the use of such property in a manner inconsistent with any Federal treaty, agreement, or statute or with any regulation made pursuant thereto; or shall confer jurisdiction upon the State to adjudicate, in probate proceedings or otherwise, the ownership or right to possession of such property or any interest therein.(c) Any tribal ordinance or custom heretofore or hereafter adopted by an Indian tribe, band, or community in the exercise of any authority which it may possess shall, if not inconsistent with any applicable civil law of the State, be given full force and effect in the determination of civil causes of action pursuant to this section.(Added Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 505, § 4, 67 Stat. 589; amended Aug. 24, 1954, ch. 910, § 2, 68 Stat. 795; Pub. L. 85–615, § 2, Aug. 8, 1958, 72 Stat. 545; Pub. L. 95–598, title II, § 239, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2668; Pub. L. 98–353, title I, § 110, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 342.)Editorial NotesAmendments

1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–353 struck out “or Territories” after “Each of the States”, struck out “or Territory” after “State” in 5 places, and substituted “within the State” for “within the Territory” in item relating to Alaska.

1978—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–598 directed the amendment of subsec. (a) by substituting in the item relating to Alaska “within the State” for “within the Territory”, which amendment did not become effective pursuant to section 402(b) of Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.

1958—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 85–615 gave Alaska jurisdiction over civil causes of action between Indians or to which Indians are parties which arise in all Indian country within the Territory of Alaska.

1954—Subsec. (a). Act Aug. 24, 1954, brought the Menominee Tribe within the provisions of this section.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective July 10, 1984, see section 122(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as an Effective Date note under section 151 of this title.

Amendment of State Constitutions To Remove Legal Impediment; Effective Date

Act Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 505, § 6, 67 Stat. 590, provided that: “Notwithstanding the provisions of any Enabling Act for the admission of a State, the consent of the United States is hereby given to the people of any State to amend, where necessary, their State constitution or existing statutes, as the case may be, to remove any legal impediment to the assumption of civil and criminal jurisdiction in accordance with the provisions of this Act [adding this section and section 1162 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure]: Provided, That the provisions of this Act shall not become effective with respect to such assumption of jurisdiction by any such State until the people thereof have appropriately amended their State constitution or statutes as the case may be.”

Consent of United States to Other States To Assume Jurisdiction

Act Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 505, § 7, 67 Stat. 590, which gave consent of the United States to any other State not having jurisdiction with respect to criminal offenses or civil causes of action, or with respect to both, as provided for in this section and section 1162 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, to assume jurisdiction at such time and in such manner as the people of the State shall, by legislative action, obligate and bind the State to assumption thereof, was repealed by section 403(b) of Pub. L. 90–284, title IV, Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 79, such repeal not to affect any cession of jurisdiction made pursuant to such section prior to its repeal.

Retrocession of jurisdiction by State acquired by State pursuant to section 7 of Act Aug. 15, 1953, prior to its repeal, see section 1323 of Title 25, Indians.

Executive DocumentsAdmission of Alaska as State

Admission of Alaska into the Union was accomplished Jan. 3, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3269, Jan. 3, 1959, 24 F.R. 81, 73 Stat. c16, as required by sections 1 and 8(c) of Pub. L. 85–508, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 339, set out as notes preceding section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 408 cases (16 in the last 5 years), 1955–2026 · leading case: Atkinson v. Haldane, 569 P.2d 151 (Alaska 1977).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Atkinson v. Haldane, 569 P.2d 151 (Alaska 1977). · cites it 48× “Jurisdiction was alleged pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1360 (a) which provides, in relevant part: [1] Each of the States or Territories listed in the following table shall have jurisdiction over civil causes of action between Indians or to which Indians are parties which arise in the…”

Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800 (1976). · cites it 4× “§§ 1321 , 1322; 28 U. S. C. § 1360 . [20] Cf. *813 California Oregon Power Co.”

Bryan v. Itasca Cnty., 426 U.S. 373 (1976). · cites it 7× “Petitioner Russell Bryan, an enrolled member of the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, 1 resides in a mobile home on land held in trust by the United States for the Chippewa Tribe on the Leech Lake Reservation in Minnesota.”

K2 Am. Corp. v. Roland Oil & Gas, LLC, 653 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2011). · cites it 7× “K2 sought money damages; a constructive trust requiring Roland to assign its right, title, and interest in the Allotment Lease to K2; a declaration that K2 is the rightful owner of all right, title, and interest in the Allotment Lease; punitive or exemplary damages; and…”

Parker Drilling Co. v. Metlakatla Indian Cmty., 451 F. Supp. 1127 (D. Alaska 1978). · cites it 14× “The central objection to state court jurisdiction over this action is based on the premise that the sole basis for such jurisdiction is 28 U.S.C. § 1360 which defendant concludes cannot be utilized to confer jurisdiction in this action.”

Calista Corp. v. Mann, 564 P.2d 53 (Alaska 1977). · cites it 18× “2d 31 (Alaska, 1977), 28 U.S.C. § 1360 [6] does not serve as a grant of jurisdiction *58 to state courts to adjudicate property rights delineated in 28 U.”

Rice v. Rehner, 463 U.S. 713 (1983). · cites it 8× “589 , as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 1360 (a), which provides that a State's "civil laws .”

John v. Baker, 982 P.2d 738 (Alaska 1999). · cites it 10× “§§ 1321-26 , 28 U.S.C. § 1360 ). . 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.”

Heffle v. State, 633 P.2d 264 (Alaska 1981). · cites it 20× “28 U.S.C. § 1360 (b). At the heart of this action is the question of whether the state has a valid easement across Etalook's Native allotment.”

Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Eng'g, P. C., 467 U.S. 138 (1984). · cites it 4× “588 , as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 1360 , commonly known as Pub.”

Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Eng'g, P. C., 476 U.S. 877 (1986). · cites it 4× “588 , as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 1360 , which is commonly known as Pub.”

Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe of Ariz., 463 U.S. 545 (1983). · cites it 4× “" 28 U. S. C. § 1360 (b) (emphasis added). [11] Thus, the presence or *561 absence of jurisdiction must rise or fall without reference to whether the States have assumed jurisdiction under Pub.”

Show all 408 citing cases →

— 28 U.S.C. § 1360(a) — 2 cases

John v. Baker, 982 P.2d 738 (Alaska 1999). “§§ 1321-26 , 28 U.S.C. § 1360 ). . 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.”

Becker Cnty. Welfare Dep't v. Bellcourt, 453 N.W.2d 543 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990).

— 28 U.S.C. § 1360(b) — 2 cases

Ollestead v. Native Vill. of Tyonek, 560 P.2d 31 (Alaska 1977).

Portland Gen. Elec. Co. v. State Tax Comm'n, 2 Or. Tax 222 (Or. T.C. 1965).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.