28 U.S.C. § 1399
Partition action involving United States
Any civil action by any tenant in common or joint tenant for the partition of lands, where the United States is one of the tenants in common or joint tenants, may be brought only in the judicial district where such lands are located or, if located in different districts in the same State, in any of such districts.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1972–2020 · leading case: Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States
Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States (1972)
“11, infra, ) and under 28 U. S. C. §§ 1399 and 2409 (authorizing a partition action where the United States is a tenant in common or a joint tenant).”
Helen Debreceni, Etc. v. Merchants Terminal Corporation and Terminal Refrigeration and Warehousing Corporation (1989)
“Merchants submits that certain breaches of statutory duty on the part of the Fund (specifically, the duty to review the withdrawal liability determination upon requést by the employer and the duty to provide information relevant to the calculation of the withdrawal liability,…”
Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity v. Brunt Associates, Inc. (2020)
“First, BAI contends that the manner in which the Fund transmitted the May 24 Notice – via UPS delivery addressed to Brunt – was not a sufficient means of providing notice of withdrawal liability under 28 U.S.C. § 1399 (b)(1), and thus BAI should not be deemed to have received…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.