28 U.S.C. § 154
Division of businesses; chief judge
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: Massachusetts Ex Rel. Department of Public Welfare v. Dartmouth House Nursing Home, Inc. (In Re Dartmouth House Nursing
Massachusetts Ex Rel. Department of Public Welfare v. Dartmouth House Nursing Home, Inc. (In Re Dartmouth House Nursing (1983)
“28 U.S.C.A. § 154 (Supp.1983). [9] Appointment to an appellate panel does not affect a bankruptcy judge's term of office or compensation.”
Howard v. Collins, and United States of America, Intervenor v. William Foreman, Vincent Pilleters and Terry Warden (1984)
“28 U.S.C. § 154 . These new courts were granted jurisdiction over all “civil proceedings arising under title 11 [the Bankruptcy title] or arising in or related to cases under title 11.”
Scott v. American Security Insurance Co. (In re Scott) (2017)
“IV); 28 U.S.C. § 154 (1976 ed., Supp. IV). As such, bankruptcy judges, unlike the district court judges, were not Art.”
Marathon Pipeline Co. v. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. (1981)
“28 U.S.C. § 154 . This salary, however, is unprotected, and Congress may at its discretion choose to diminish it.”
In re Pustejovsky (2017)
“The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 154 and 1334. These are core proceedings within the meaning of 28 U.”
Strauss v. Zielinski (In Re Strauss) (1989)
“It is from this judgment order of June 29, 1988 that this appeal is taken, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 154 (a). DISCUSSION The appellant Strauss has framed the questions before the court as solely questions of law.”
In Re Ludwick (1995)
“28 U.S.C. § 154 (a). We believe this statute also gives us the authority to sit en banc.”
In Re Postconfirmation Fees (1998)
“§ 1930 (a)(6) and one debtor had confirmed its plan after that date, but before the effective date of the second amendment.”
In Re Rheuban (1991)
“28 U.S.C. § 154 (b), (district judges have power to appoint chief bankruptcy judge).”
In Re Kovalchick (1994)
“On August 22, 1994, this court, although finding the recusal motions without merit, acted in our capacity as chief judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 154 (b), and reassigned these cases and the K & M Case to the Philadelphia District and, particularly, this court.”
Minerex Erdoel, Inc., Cross-Appellees v. Sina, Inc., Baker, Smith & Mills, F/k/a Baker, Miller, Mills & Murray, Cross-Ap (1988)
“Section 201(a) of BRA ( 28 U.S.C. § 154 ). The adjustments are made under § 225 of the Federal Salary Act of 1967 ( 2 U.”
Stark v. Fifarek (In re Fifarek) (2007)
“28 U.S.C. § 154 (a) (the bankruptcy judges in this district shall determine rules for the division of its cases).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.