28 U.S.C. § 156
Staff; expenses
1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–702 inserted at end “A law clerk appointed under this section shall be exempt from the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 63 of title 5, unless specifically included by the appointing judge or by local rule of court.”
1986—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 99–554, § 103, added subsec. (d).
Subsecs. (e), (f). Pub. L. 99–554, §§ 142, 144(a), added subsecs. (e) and (f).
Amendment by section 103 of Pub. L. 99–554 effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31
cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1983–2025 · leading case: Paloian v. American Express Co. (In Re Canopy Financial, Inc.)
Paloian v. American Express Co. (In Re Canopy Financial, Inc.) (2011)
“” 28 U.S.C. § 156 (b)(2)(H). Thus, the statute provides the Bankruptcy Court with authority to enter final judgment on Paloian’s claims.”
United State ex rel. Minge v. Hawker Beechcraft Corp. (In re Hawker Beechcraft, Inc.) (2014)
“(“Epiq”) as “claims agent” at the debtors’ request, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 156 (c). On June 5, 2012, Epiq mailed a “Notice of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Cases, Meeting of Creditors, & Deadlines,” dated June 5, 2012 (the “Notice”), to creditors and other parties in interest.”
Linder v. Trump's Castle Associates (1993)
“The Court authorized Claudia King & Associates to serve as the debtor’s claims agent under 28 U.S.C. § 156 (c), who certified that they mailed the notice of bar date to appellant’s counsel, Jeffrey Sheppard, on March 19, 1992 and that as of October 23, 1992, the notice had not…”
Matter of Seven Springs Apartments, Phase II (1983)
“28 U.S.C. § 156 . In summary, the District Court Local Rule is without authority to refer (or withdraw) cases and proceedings already referred by § 405(a)(1) and 11 U.”
L.T. Ruth Coal Co. v. Big Sandy Coal & Coke Co. (In Re L.T. Ruth Coal Co.) (1986)
“Thus these courts, and the bankruptcy courts ( 28 U.S.C. § 156 (b)), may be said to have “unfettered” administrative control over the office of clerk of the court.”
In Re Lindstrom (2005)
“This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 156 (b)(2)(B) over which this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.”
Gentry v. Circuit City Stores, Inc. (In Re Circuit City Stores, Inc.) (2010)
“On November 12, 2008, the bankruptcy court appointed Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC (“KCC”) as the claims, noticing, and balloting agent for the Debtors, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 156 (c). On December 10, 2008, the bankruptcy court entered an Order setting January 30, 2009 (the…”
Kozec v. Murphy (In re Murphy) (2017)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 156 (b). 11 If the bankruptcy judges obtain subject matter jurisdiction over a personal injury tort or wrongful death claim through referral under 28 U.”
Chorman v. Foamex International, Inc. (In re Foamex International, Inc.) (2013)
“*103 JURISDICTION By order dated February 22, 2012, the Court determined that this proceeding is non-core pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 156 (b)(3). (D.I. 118). The parties thereafter moved to withdraw the reference, and by order dated April 5, 2012, the District Court referred the…”
Smith v. Ball (In Re Smith) (1987)
“This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 156 (b)(2)(A); pursuant to 28 U.”
United States ex rel. Minge v. Hawker Beechcraft Corp. (In re Hawker Beechcraft Inc.) (2013)
“At the Debtors’ request, the Court appointed Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC (“Epiq”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 156 (c) to serve as the “claims agent” in the case.”
Madison Square Boys & Girls Club, Inc. (2022)
“28 U.S.C. § 156 (c) and the SDNY Protocol The Clerk is the “official custodian of the records and dockets of the bankruptcy court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.