28 U.S.C. § 173
Times and places of holding court
The principal office of the United States Court of Federal Claims shall be in the District of Columbia, but the Court of Federal Claims may hold court at such times and in such places as it may fix by rule of court. The times and places of the sessions of the Court of Federal Claims shall be prescribed with a view to securing reasonable opportunity to citizens to appear before the Court of Federal Claims with as little inconvenience and expense to citizens as is practicable.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1934–2024 · leading case: Glidden Co. v. Zdanok
Glidden Co. v. Zdanok (1962)
“612 (1855), as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 173 (Court of Claims); 46 Stat.”
In Re United States (1989)
“The Claims Court noted (1) that 28 U.S.C. § 173 (1982) permits it to “hold court at such times and in such places as it may fix by rule of court,” (2) that Rule 39(a) of the Rules of the United States Claims Court (RUSCC) provides that “[a]ll contested issues of fact and law…”
Bishop v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Edmondson (2009)
“The Couples’ complaint challenged the substantive provision of § 2, codified at 28 U.S.C. § 173 8 C, which provides: No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of…”
United States v. Orshek (1947)
“The parts of the 1907 Act establishing divisions in the District of Nebraska were revised and codified and were embraced in Section 93 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 173 . This section does not contain any specific venue provisions, such as sections 7 and 8 of the Act of…”
Tannahill v. United States (1992)
“" 28 U.S.C. § 173 (1982). . The court can only surmise from Mr.”
American Nat. Red Cross v. Raven Honey Dew Mills (1934)
“The judgment appealed from was entered January 27, 1934, and motion for new trial was overruled February 26, 1934, during the regular term of the District Court beginning in September, 1933, and expiring in April, 1934 (28 USCA § 173). No bill of exceptions was signed and…”
Hillier v. Hillier (1996)
“The next day, in Massachusetts, after a hearing in which the Probate Court judge was presented with the Florida order determining jurisdiction, he denied the father’s motion to dismiss the Massachusetts custody complaint and entered a temporary order granting custody to the…”
United States v. Robert Bryant Jenkins and Orvilla Jenkins (1970)
“Robert was convicted on one count of selling cocaine, 28 U.S.C. §§ 173 , 174 (1964), one count of conspiracy to sell cocaine, and one count of selling cocaine without the proper order forms, 26 U.”
United Penn Bank v. U.S.A. Small Business Administration (1984)
“§ 173 , which provides that the principal office of the Claims Court shall be in the District of Columbia, but “the Claims Court may hold court at such times and in such places as it may fix by rule of court. The times and places of the sessions of the Claims Court shall be…”
Morehouse v. United States (1938)
“Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 173 . It is clear that the river has changed its course, and there was evidence that the land described in the indictment has existed at least since 1931.”
Oztimurlenk, R.N. v. United States (2022)
“July 23, 2021) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 173 ); see also 28 U.S.C. §§ 798 (a), 2505 (“Any judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims may sit at any place within the United States to take evidence and enter judgment.”
Nygaard v. Taylor (2022)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 173 8A. Fathers’ claim that “a territory or possession of the United States” includes Indian tribes is belied by the common and longstanding use of these terms in statutes and case law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.