28 U.S.C. § 177
Disbarment of removed judges
A judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims removed from office in accordance with section 176 of this title shall not be permitted at any time to practice before the Court of Federal Claims.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2001–2022 · leading case: Oneida Indian Nation v. New York
Oneida Indian Nation v. New York (2001)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 177 ; see also U.S. Const. Art.”
(PS) Eisner v. Hollister (2022)
“1, PC 148, 8th Amendment, 8 28 U.S.C. § 177 .” She states in a conclusory fashion that “Hollister is guilty of vindictive 9 prosecution, slander, defamation, misuse of 1368, [and] conspiracy, [and] the jail is guilty of cruel 10 and unusual punishment and theft.”
(PS) Eisner v. Hollister (2022)
“1, PC 148, 8th Amendment, 28 U.S.C. § 177 .” She states in a conclusory fashion that “Hollister is guilty of vindictive 25 prosecution, slander, defamation, misuse of 1368, [and] conspiracy, [and] the jail is guilty of cruel and unusual punishment and theft.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.