28 U.S.C. § 2322

United States as party

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

All actions specified in section 2321 of this title shall be brought by or against the United States.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 53 cases, 1949–1993 · leading case: Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Great Lakes Carbon Corporation
Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Great Lakes Carbon Corporation (1980) ca8 · cites it 5× “28 U.S.C. § 2322 . The district court denied relief, stating it had considered the basic issues raised in its earlier opinion, from which no appeal had been taken.”
United States v. Drum (1962) scotus · cites it 2× “" [4] The United States intervened as defendant, 28 U. S. C. § 2322 , and appellee Weather-Seal and appellant Regular Common Carrier Conference intervened as plaintiff and defendant respectively, 28 U.”
Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. United States (1950) scotus · cites it 2× “[2] After unsuccessfully seeking reconsideration and modification of the order by the full Commission, the appellant sued the United States (see 28 U. S. C. § 2322 ), in the District Court for the District of Columbia, asking that court to set aside that part of the Commission's…”
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line R. (1966) scotus “Although the carrier’s suit must be brought against the United States, 28 U. S. C. § 2322 (1964 ed.), the Commission and the shipper may intervene as of right, 28 U.”
Mail Order Association of America v. United States Postal Service, No. 91-1058 (1993) cadc “shall be brought by or against the United States,” 28 U.S.C. § 2322 (emphasis added), and that the Attorney General “shall represent the Government in the actions specified____” Id.”
Schwartz v. Bowman (1965) nysd · cites it 2× “” 28 U.S.C. § 2322 . The United States is to be represented by the Attorney General.”
Isner v. Interstate Commerce Commission (1950) mied · cites it 3× “Under the law, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2322 , suits against the Interstate Commerce Commission must be brought against the United States.”
United States v. ICC (1949) scotus “28 U.S.C. §§ 2322 , 2323. Congressional consent is required to authorize such a suit and congressional consent has been authorized only under the conditions requisite for a three-judge court proceeding for which this Court finds no jurisdiction, 28 U.”
Western Pacific Railroad v. United States (1965) scotus · cites it 2× “[4] Pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 2322 (1964 ed.), the United States was named as defendant in the District Court.”
W. H. B. Simpson v. South Western Railroad Company and Central of Georgia Railway Company (1956) ca5 · cites it 2× “” 28 U.S.C.A. § 2322 : “All actions specified in Section 2321 of this title shall bo brought by or against the United States.”
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Railway Co. (1974) gamd · cites it 2× “24 (b) and to add the United States as an additional defendant under 28 U.S.C. § 2322 . According to their proposed complaints Nashville Milling Company and Mr.”
Pacific Inland Tariff Bureau v. United States (1955) ord · cites it 2× “The United States of America, because of statutory necessity, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2322 , was also made a party.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.