28 U.S.C. § 2401

Time for commencing action against United States

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Except as provided by chapter 71 of title 41, every civil action commenced against the United States shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues. The action of any person under legal disability or beyond the seas at the time the claim accrues may be commenced within three years after the disability ceases.(b) A tort claim against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the appropriate Federal agency within two years after such claim accrues or unless action is begun within six months after the date of mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice of final denial of the claim by the agency to which it was presented.(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 971; Apr. 25, 1949, ch. 92, § 1, 63 Stat. 62; Pub. L. 86–238, § 1(3), Sept. 8, 1959, 73 Stat. 472; Pub. L. 89–506, § 7, July 18, 1966, 80 Stat. 307; Pub. L. 95–563, § 14(b), Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2389; Pub. L. 111–350, § 5(g)(8), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3848.)Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 41(20), 942 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 24, part 20, 36 Stat. 1093; Nov. 23, 1921, ch. 136, § 1310(c), 42 Stat. 311; June 2, 1924, 4:01 p.m., ch. 234, § 1025(c), 43 Stat. 348; Feb. 24, 1925, ch. 309, 43 Stat. 972; Feb. 26, 1926, ch. 27, §§ 1122(c), 1200, 44 Stat. 121, 125; Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, § 420, 60 Stat. 845).

Section consolidates provision in section 41(20) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., as to time limitation for bringing actions against the United States under section 1346(a) of this title, with section 942 of said title 28.

Words “or within one year after the date of enactment of this Act whichever is later”, in section 942 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were omitted as executed.

Provisions of section 41(20) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to jurisdiction of district courts and trial by the court of actions against the United States are the basis of sections 1346(a) and 2402 of this title.

Words in subsec. (a) of this revised section, “person under legal disability or beyond the seas at the time the claim accrues” were substituted for “claims of married women, first accrued during marriage, of persons under the age of twenty-one years, first accrued during minority, and of idiots, lunatics, insane persons, and persons beyond the seas at the time the claim accrued, entitled to the claim.” (See reviser’s note under section 2501 of this title.)

Words in section 41(20) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., “nor shall any of the said disabilities operate cumulatively” were omitted. (See reviser’s note under section 2501 of this title.)

A provision in section 41(20) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., that disabilities other than those specifically mentioned should not prevent any action from being barred was omitted as superfluous.

Subsection (b) of the revised section simplifies and restates said section 942 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., without change of substance.

Changes were made in phraseology.

Senate Revision Amendment

Subsection (b) amended in the Senate to insert the 1 year limitation on the bringing of tort actions and to include the limitation upon the time in which tort claims not exceeding $1000 must be presented to the appropriate Federal agencies for administrative disposition. 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559, Amendment No. 48.

Editorial NotesAmendments

2011—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–350 substituted “chapter 71 of title 41” for “the Contract Disputes Act of 1978”.

1978—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–563 inserted Contract Disputes Act of 1978 exception.

1966—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 89–506 struck out provisions dealing with a tort claim of $2,500 or under as a special category of tort claim requiring preliminary administrative action and substituted provisions requiring presentation of all tort claims to the appropriate Federal agency in writing within two years after the claim accrues and commencement of an action within six months of the date of mailing of notice of final denial of the claim by the agency to which it was presented for provisions requiring commencement of an action within two years after the claim accrues.

1959—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 86–238 substituted “$2,500” for “$1,000” in two places.

1949—Subsec. (b). Act Apr. 25, 1949, the time limitation on bringing tort actions from 1 year to 2 years.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–563 effective with respect to contracts entered into 120 days after Nov. 1, 1978, and, at the election of the contractor, with respect to any claim pending at such time before the contracting officer or initiated thereafter, see section 16 of Pub. L. 95–563, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2391, formerly set out as an Effective Date note under section 601 of former Title 41, Public Contracts.

Effective Date of 1966 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 89–506 applicable to claims accruing six months or more after July 18, 1966, see section 10 of Pub. L. 89–506, set out as a note under section 2672 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4,131 cases (969 in the last 5 years), 1948–2026 · leading case: Kwai Wong v. David Beebe, 732 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2013).
Kwai Wong v. David Beebe, 732 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2013). · cites it 47× “BEEBE Opinion by Judge Berzon; Concurrence by Chief Judge Kozinski; Dissent by Judge Tashima; Dissent by Judge Bea SUMMARY* Federal Tort Claims Act The en banc court reversed the district court’s dismissal of a negligence claim brought against the United States and remanded,…”
Corner Post, Inc. v. Bd. of Governors, 603 U.S. 799 (2024). · cites it 9× “The District Court dismissed the suit as time barred under 28 U. S. C. § 2401 (a), the default 6-year statute of limita- tions applicable to suits against the United States.”
Ibinga Bertin v. United States of Am., Docket No. 05-4503-Cv, 478 F.3d 489 (2d Cir. 2007). · cites it 8× “Construing Bertin’s action as one brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1355 , the court dismissed it because he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by filing no administrative claim within the two-year statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.”
Santos Ex Rel. Beato v. United States, 559 F.3d 189 (3rd Cir. 2009). · cites it 8× “28 U.S.C. § 2401 (b). On September 2, 2005, as the FTCA provides, the Attorney General's designee certified that the state-court defendants were federal employees acting within the scope of their employment and removed the case to the District Court.”
United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111 (1979). · cites it 6× “Under the Federal Tort Claims Act (Act), [1] 28 U. S. C. § 2401 (b), a tort claim against the United States is barred unless it is presented in writing to the appropriate federal agency "within two years after such claim accrues.”
Barnes v. United States, 776 F.3d 1134 (10th Cir. 2015). · cites it 10× “The district court dis *1137 missed the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), based on its finding that the Barneses’ claims were time-barred under the six-month statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. § 2401 (b). The…”
Bobby Jackson v. United States, 751 F.3d 712 (6th Cir. 2014). · cites it 12× “28 U.S.C. § 2401 (b) (emphasis added). With respect to situations in which the agency’s delay precludes the claimant from bringing a claim—for example, when an agency has not yet issued a notice of denial—a claimant may sue the United States according to the terms of § 2675(a):…”
Jackson v. Kotter, 541 F.3d 688 (7th Cir. 2008). · cites it 5× “Jackson appeals the district court’s dismissal of the United States, as well as the district court’s dismissal of three individual defendants; its grant of summary judgment in favor of Physician’s Assistant (“P.”
United States v. Rodriguez-Aguirre, 264 F.3d 1195 (10th Cir. 2001). · cites it 8× “Finally, we hold that the six-year statute of limitations set forth at 28 U.S.C. § 2401 (a) applies to the bringing of a Rule 41(e) motion.”
Orville MacKlin v. United States, 300 F.3d 814 (7th Cir. 2002). · cites it 11× “Macklin had failed to bring his action within what it deemed the applicable six-year statute of limitations period, 28 U.S.C. § 2401 (a). The Government emphasized that this latter provision conditioned the waiver of sovereign immunity found in § 2410 and barred all civil…”
Humphrey v. United States Attorney Gen.'s Off., 279 F. App'x 328 (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 6× “By certified letter dated December 3, 2004, the Postal Service denied his claim and advised him, in accordance with the FTCA’s statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2401 (b), that “if dissatisfied with the Postal Service’s final denial of an administrative claim, [he]…”
Mader v. United States, 654 F.3d 794 (8th Cir. 2011). · cites it 5× “§ 2401 (b), [2] 2672, and 2675, a claim shall be deemed to have been presented when a Federal agency receives from a claimant, his duly authorized agent or legal representative, [1] an executed Standard Form 95 or other written notification of an incident, [2] accompanied by a…”
— 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a) — 22 cases
Corner Post, Inc. v. Bd. of Governors, 603 U.S. 799 (2024). “The District Court dismissed the suit as time barred under 28 U. S. C. § 2401 (a), the default 6-year statute of limita- tions applicable to suits against the United States.”
Conservation Force v. Salazar, 811 F. Supp. 2d 18 (D.D.C. 2011).
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. Johnson, 540 F. Supp. 2d 125 (D.D.C. 2008).
Wyo-Ben Inc. v. Haaland, 63 F.4th 857 (10th Cir. 2023).
Auction Co. of Am. v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 132 F.3d 746 (D.C. Cir. 1997).
— 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b) — 51 cases
White v. Johns-Manville Corp., 693 P.2d 687 (Wash. 1985).
Stanley Bialowas, Jr. v. United States, 443 F.2d 1047 (3rd Cir. 1971).
Paul Eugene Tessier v. United States, 269 F.2d 305 (1st Cir. 1959).
James F. Toal v. United States, 438 F.2d 222 (2d Cir. 1971).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.