28 U.S.C. § 2503

Proceedings generally

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Parties to any suit in the United States Court of Federal Claims may appear before a judge of that court in person or by attorney, produce evidence, and examine witnesses.(b) The proceedings of the Court of Federal Claims shall be in accordance with such rules of practice and procedure (other than the rules of evidence) as the Court of Federal Claims may prescribe and in accordance with the Federal Rules of Evidence.(c) The judges of the Court of Federal Claims shall fix times for trials, administer oaths or affirmations, examine witnesses, receive evidence, and enter dispositive judgments. Hearings shall, if convenient, be held in the counties where the witnesses reside.(d) For the purpose of construing sections 1821, 1915, 1920, and 1927 of this title, the United States Court of Federal Claims shall be deemed to be a court of the United States.(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 976; Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1263, § 53, 68 Stat. 1246; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 139(b)(1), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 42; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §§ 902(a), 909, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516, 4519.)Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 269, 276, and 278 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§ 168, 170, 36 Stat. 1140; Feb. 24, 1925, ch. 301, § 1, 43 Stat. 964; June 23, 1930, ch. 573, § 2, 46 Stat. 799).

Section consolidates provisions relating to proceedings before commissioners and reporter-commissioners contained in sections 269, 276, and 278 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.

Provisions of section 269 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to appointment and compensation of commissioners are incorporated in section 792 of this title.

Words “including reporter-commissioners” after “commissioners” were inserted to clarify meaning and conform to Rule 54(a) of the Court of Claims authorizing oaths before reporter-commissioners.

Changes were made in phraseology.

Senate Revision Amendment

The Senate amended this section by inserting “and when directed by the court his recommendations for conclusions of law” following “commissioner” in the second paragraph. This amendment authorizes the Court to direct its commissioners to report recommendations for conclusions of law as well as findings of fact in cases assigned to them. 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559, Amendment No. 50.

Editorial NotesReferences in Text

The Federal Rules of Evidence, referred to in subsec. (b), are set out in the Appendix to this title.

Amendments

1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–572, § 902(a)(1), substituted “United States Court of Federal Claims” for “United States Claims Court”.

Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 102–572, § 902(a)(2), substituted “Court of Federal Claims” for “Claims Court” wherever appearing.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 102–572, § 909, added subsec. (d).

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted “Proceedings generally” for “Proceedings before commissioners generally” in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–164 substituted “Parties to any suit in the United States Claims Court may appear before a judge of that court in person or by attorney, produce evidence, and examine witnesses” for “Parties to any suit in the Court of Claims may appear before a commissioner in person or by attorney, produce evidence and examine witnesses” and redesignated as subsec. (c) provisions that, in accordance with rules and orders of the court, commissioners would fix times for trials, administer oaths or affirmations to and examine witnesses, receive evidence and report findings of fact, that when directed by the court, commissioners would report their recommendations for conclusions of law in cases assigned to them, and that hearings would, if convenient, be held in the counties where the witnesses resided.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–164 substituted “The proceedings of the Claims Court shall be in accordance with such rules of practice and procedure (other than the rules of evidence) as the Claims Court may prescribe and in accordance with the Federal Rules of Evidence” for “The rules of the court shall provide for the filing in court of the commissioner’s report of facts and recommendations for conclusions of law, and for opportunity for the parties to file exceptions thereto, and a hearing thereon before the court within a reasonable time” and struck out provision that this section did not prevent the court from passing upon all questions and findings regardless of whether exceptions were taken before a commissioner.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97–164 redesignated provisions in second and third sentences of former subsec. (a) as (c) and substituted “The judges of the Claims Court” for “In accordance with rules and orders of the court, commissioners” and “enter dispositive judgments” for “report findings of fact and, when directed by the court, their recommendations for conclusions of law in cases assigned to them”.

1954—Act Sept. 3, 1954, designated former first par. subsec. (a), and former second par. subsec. (b), and incorporated in one place provisions relating to function of Commissioners.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 153 cases (22 in the last 5 years), 1962–2026 · leading case: Hayes v. United States
Hayes v. United States (2006) uscfc · cites it 4× “Subsequent to the ruling in Cofield , Congress amended 28 U.S.C. § 2503 by adding a new subsection providing that “[f]or the purpose of construing sections 1821, 1915, 1920, and 1927 of this title, the United States Court of Federal Claims shall be deemed to be a court of the…”
Matthews v. United States (2006) uscfc · cites it 2× “4506 , 4519 (codified as amended at 28 U.S.C. § 2503 (d) (2000)); see Hayes v.”
Bannum, Inc. v. United States (2005) cafc “5 See 28 U.S.C. § 2503 (b). When interpreting Rule 56.”
Washington v. United States (2010) uscfc · cites it 4× “4506 , 4519 (codified as amended at 28 U.S.C. § 2503 (d)) (“[F]or the purpose of construing sections 1821, 1915, 1920, and 1927 of this title, the United States Court of Federal Claims shall be deemed to be a court of the United States.”
Bright v. United States (2010) cafc · cites it 2× “28 U.S.C. § 2503 vests the Court of Federal Claims with the authority to prescribe rules of procedure governing the conduct of cases in the court, which cases include class actions.”
Glidden Co. v. Zdanok (1962) scotus · cites it 2× “5237, as amended, id. (Supp. III), p. 863. [37] In 1950, Tucker Act cases constituted 2,350 of the 2,472 proceedings conducted by the court.”
Talasila, Inc., and M.R. Mikkilineni v. United States (2001) cafc · cites it 2× “The authority of the Court of Federal Claims to promulgate rules of practice and procedure before the court is derived from 28 U.S.C. § 2503 , which provides that “[t]he proceedings of the Court of Federal Claims shall be in accordance with such rules of practice and procedure .”
Pueblo of Laguna v. United States (2004) uscfc · cites it 2× “In 28 U.S.C. § 2503 (c) (2000), moreover, Congress authorized this court to “examine witnesses, receive evidence, and enter dispositive judgments.”
Shell Oil Company v. United States (2018) cafc “"), which allow parties to submit for consideration relevant evidence, defined as that which "has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without evidence," Fed.”
Pikulin v. United States (2011) uscfc “See 28 U.S.C. § 2503 (d) (deeming the Court of Federal Claims to be "a court of the United States" for the purposes of § 1915); see also Matthews v.”
McCauley v. States (1997) uscfc · cites it 2× “Furthermore, 28 U.S.C. § 2503 (d) states the following: § 2503.”
Barnes v. United States (2005) uscfc “"On points of substantive law, Court of Claims precedent is controlling, binding authority in our cases," this court has stated, but "Court of Claims decisions regarding its rules of procedure are not binding upon this court in the interpretation of our rules promulgated under…”
— 28 U.S.C. § 2503(d) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.