U.S. Code » Title 28 » Part PART II— DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › Chapter CHAPTER 39— UNITED STATES TRUSTEES

28 U.S.C. § 308

CONSIDERATION OF CURRENT PRIVATE TRUSTEES FOR APPOINTMENT BY UNITED STATES TRUSTEES.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)Trustees in Bankruptcy Cases Under Chapter 7.—It is the sense of the Congress that individuals who are serving before the effective date of this Act, as trustees in cases under chapter 7 of title 11, United States Code, should be considered by United States trustees for appointment under section 586(a)(1) of title 28, United States Code, to the panels of private trustees that are established as a result of the amendments made by this Act [see Short Title of 1986 Amendment note below].“(b)Standing Trustees in Bankruptcy Cases Under Chapter 13.—It is the sense of the Congress that individuals who are serving before the effective date of this Act, as standing trustees in cases under chapter 13 of title 11, United States Code, should be considered by the United States trustees for appointment under section 586(b) of title 28, United States Code, as standing trustees who are appointed as a result of the amendments made by this Act [see Short Title of 1986 Amendment note below].
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1933–1947 · leading case: Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ill. v. United States
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ill. v. United States (1933) scotus “28 U.S.C. § 308 ; 287 U.S. 596 . The Tariff Act of 1922 is entitled — 'An Act to provide revenue, to regulate commerce with foreign countries', to encourage the industries of the United States, and for other purposes.”
Boston Wool Trade Ass'n v. Snyder (1947) cadc “The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. 46 Stat. 646 , 52 Stat. 1090 , 19 U.”
National Sanitary Rag Co. v. Hamilton (1933) cand “28 USCA § 308. Having reached the conclusion that this court is without jurisdiction to consider and determine questions of the character presented in the bill of complaint, it is unnecessary to determine the further question, raised by the motion to dismiss, whether the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.