28 U.S.C. § 354
Action by judicial council
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 36
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1929–2026 · leading case: Danos v. Jones
Danos v. Jones (2011)
“The Council certified this determination to the Judicial Conference of the United States in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 354 (b)(2)(A). The matter was referred to the Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference, which issued a report and recommendation…”
In re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct (2014)
“Moreover, the March 15 order was subject to the § 360(b) publication requirement, because it ordered action “to assure the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 354 (a)(1)(C). Accordingly, and irrespective of…”
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Lindholm (1933)
“§ 862 (28 USCA § 862); Supreme Court Rule 9 (28 USCA § 354). The purpose is to enable the court as well as opposing counsel, readily to perceive what points are relied on.”
Hard & Rand, Inc. v. Biston Coffee Co. (1930)
“Only so much of the evidence áhall be embraced in a hill of exceptions, as may be necessary to present clearly the questions of law involved in the rulings to which exceptions are reserved, and such evidence as is embraced therein shall be set forth in condensed and narrative…”
In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct (2009)
“See 28 U.S.C. §§ 354 (a)-(b). The Judicial Council also may dismiss the complaint, see Rule 20(b)(1)(A), or it may “conclude the proceeding because appropriate corrective action has been taken or intervening events have made the proceeding unnecessary,” Rule 20(b)(1)(B).”
In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct (2009)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 354 (a)(1)(B); Rule 20(b)(1)(A)(iv).”
In Re Opinion of Judicial Conference Committee to Review Circuit Council Conduct and Disability Orders (2006)
“” 28 U.S.C. § 354 (a)(1). Section 353(c) in turn is limited to reports made by “[ejach [special] committee appointed under subsection (a).”
Danos v. Jones (2010)
“Application of Ultra Vires Exception Based on Lack of Authority Danos has alleged in the Complaint that the Judicial Conference’s order regarding suspension of the ability to employ staff went beyond the authority given to the Judicial Council by the Judicial Conference and 28…”
In re Charges of Judicial Misconduct (2006)
“See 28 U.S.C. §§ 354 (a)-(b), 355(a); Local Rules 14(a), (e)-(g).”
Becker Steel Co. of America v. Hicks (1933)
“” Paragraph 4 of Rule 19 of the Supreme Court of the United States (28 USCA § 354) likewiso deals with the survival of actions against officials, and provides that: “Where a public officer, by or against whom a suit is brought, dies or ceases to hold the office while the suit is…”
American Trust Co. v. Speers Sand & Clay Works, Inc. (1932)
“” This rule is, in substance, the same as paragraph 2 of rule 36 of the United States Supreme Court, 28 USCA § 354 (formerly rule 29 of that court).”
Rowlett v. Fairfax (1978)
“The provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 354 belie this claim. That section specifically gives the Attorney General the power to compile arrest records', even if the disposition of the arrest is wholly unknown to the F.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.