28 U.S.C. § 412
Sale of Supreme Court reports
The Director of the Government Publishing Office, or other printer designated by the Supreme Court of the United States shall print such additional bound volumes and preliminary prints of such reports as may be required for sale to the public. Such additional copies shall be sold by the Superintendent of Documents, as provided by law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1891–2023 · leading case: Ballard v. United States
Ballard v. United States (1946)
“[2] Thus Judicial Code § 276, 28 U.S.C. § 412 provides for the drawing of "All such jurors, grand and petit" from persons "possessing the qualifications prescribed" in § 411.”
Khulumani v. Barclay National Bank Ltd. (2007)
“§ 1350 , which provides that `[t]he district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States,' similarly identifies certain substantive law violations as…”
Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co. (1946)
“So far as federal jurors are concerned, they must be chosen “without reference to party affiliations,” 28 U. S. C. § 412 ; and citizens cannot be disqualified “on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude,” 28 U.”
National Labor Relations Board v. Baldwin Locomotive Works (1942)
“the unpaid commissioner, 28 U.S. C.A. § 412. [13] Referred to in footnote 9 of the majority opinion.”
Bunz v. Moving Picture Machine Operators' Protective Union Local 224 (1977)
“Our review of the record makes plain that there existed no issue of fact regarding plaintiffs exhaustion of internal union remedies.”
Washington Alliance of Technology Workers v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2016)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 412 (d)(1)(B). It must also “allege that the position of the United States was not substantially justified.”
United States v. Meyer (1940)
“In 28 U.S.C. § 412 , 28 U.S.C.A. §' 412, it is provided that jurors must be drawn from a box containing the names of not less than 300 persons possessing the qualifications prescribed.”
Thiel v. Southern Pac. Co. (1946)
“, in compliance with Section 276, as amended, of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 412 . At that time the Court announced that it was deemed advisable to hold a session so that there could be a public drawing of the jurors.”
Hauptman v. United States (1930)
“43 , § 2 [ 28 U.S.C.A. § 412 ]). This law was carried into the Compiled Laws of Alaska 1913 by the provisions of section 2228 thereof, which provided that the trial jurors should be “selected and summoned in the manner prescribed by the laws of the United States with respect to…”
Morgan v. Sun Oil Co. (1940)
“The appellants contend that the jury trying the case was not a lawful jury for the reason that the names of nine men on the jury panel were not drawn from the jury box as provided by Section 276 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 412 . The record shows that on October 28, 1938,…”
United States v. Roemig (1943)
“f California followed the holdings of the Supreme Court of California to the effect that the provisions of the Code of that state making women eligible to jury service were “directory and not mandatory” and held that the selection by a jury commissioner and clerk in a federal…”
Shaffer v. Defense Intelligence Agency (2015)
“claim for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 412 . 12 . Col. Olivero is a West Point graduate who served 27 years in the Army before his retirement as a Colonel of Special Forces in December 2005.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.