28 U.S.C. § 413

Publications; distribution to courts

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

Distribution of publications to Federal courts in accordance with the provisions of this chapter shall not be made to any place where such court is held in a building not owned or controlled by the United States unless such publications are committed to the custody of an officer of the United States at such building.

The Attorney General and the Director in the procurement of law books, books of reference or periodicals may exchange or sell similar items and apply the allowance or proceeds to payment in whole or in part of the cost of the items procured.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1929–1964 · leading case: Ballard v. United States
Ballard v. United States (1946) scotus · cites it 2× “[5] Judicial Code § 277, 28 U.S.C. § 413 . [6] No person shall serve as a petit juror "more than one term in a year.”
Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co. (1946) scotus “In addition, jurors must be returned from such parts of the district as the court may direct “so as to be most favorable to an impartial trial, and so as not to incur an unnecessary expense, or unduly burden the citizens of any part of the district with such service,” 28 U. S.…”
Walker v. United States (1937) ca8 “Section 277 of the Judicial Code, title 28 U.S.C.A. § 413 , provides that jurors shall *392 be returned from such parts of the district, from time to time, as the court shall direct so as to be most favorable t.”
Frantz v. United States (1933) ca6 “Under section 277 of the Judicial Code (28 USCA § 413) the court had power to require that jurors be returned only “from such parts of the district * * * as to be most favorable to an impartial trial.”
United States v. Local 36 of International Fishermen & Allied Workers (1947) casd · cites it 2× “668, 671 , the Court stated, with relation to the duties of the officers of the District Court charged with the matter of securing jury lists, that it “is their responsibility, and no court has the right to tell the duly constituted jury commissioners how they shall discharge…”
Seadlund v. United States (1938) ca7 “Congress has evidently placed this interpretation upon the provision in view of 28 U.S.C.A. § 413 , which reads as follows: “Jurors shall be returned from such parts of the district, from time to time, as the court shall direct, so as to be most favorable to an impartial trial,…”
Thiel v. Southern Pac. Co. (1946) cand · cites it 2× “After satisfying the Court that the sources of the names were such as “to be *939 most favorable to an impartial trial, and so as not to incur an unnecessary expense, or unduly burden the citizens of any part of the district with such service,” ( 28 U.S.C.A. § 413 ), Judge Louis…”
Walker v. United States (1940) ca9 “2d 383, 392 ; 28 U.S.C.A. § 413 . Likewise, there was no error in selecting jurors from the city in which court was being héld, after the regular panel was exhausted.”
Marvel v. Zerbst (1936) ca10 “eastern division, the counts in question would not be invalid in view of 28 U.S.C.A. § 413 , which reads as follows: “Jurors shall be returned from such parts of the district, from time to time, as the court shall direct, so as to be most favorable to an impartial trial, and so…”
United States v. Oyamada (1929) akd “” Section 277 ( 28 U.S.C.A. § 413 ) provides as follows: “Jurors shall be returned from such parts of the district, from time to time, as the court shall direct, so as to be most favorable to an impartial trial, and so as not to incur an unnecessary expense, or unduly burden the…”
Henlopen Hotel Corp. v. Aetna Insurance (1964) ded “In addition, jurors must be returned from such parts of the district as the court may direct ‘so as to be most favorable to an impartial trial, and so as not to incur any unnecessary expense, or unduly burden the citizens of any part of the district with such service,’ 28 U.S.C.…”
United States v. 25.936 Acres of Land (1943) njd “A Federal statute, 28 U.S.C.A. § 413 , provides that “jurors shall be returned from such parts of the district * * * as the court shall direct, so as to be most favorable to an impartial trial, and so as not to incur an unnecessary expense, or unduly burden the citizens of any…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.