28 U.S.C. § 459
Administration of oaths and acknowledgments
Each justice or judge of the United States may administer oaths and affirmations and take acknowledgments.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1941–2004 · leading case: Society of Separationists, Inc. v. Guy Herman, Judge of the Travis County Court at Law
Society of Separationists, Inc. v. Guy Herman, Judge of the Travis County Court at Law (1991)
“9012(b) (same); 28 U.S.C. §§ 459 , 953 (empowering justices, judges, clerks, and deputy clerks to administer "oaths and affirmations"); Tex.”
Holiday v. Johnston (1941)
“…in view of the peremptory terms of the statute, an inordinate protraction of the proceeding. 9 28 U. S. C. §. 456. 10 28 U. S. C. § 459 :”
Dorsey v. Gill (1945)
“[40] 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 459 , 460, 461; Walker v. Johnston, 312 U.”
Ex Parte Rosier (1942)
“§ 759 (1875), 28 U.S.C.A. § 459 . [11] Rev.Stat. § 760 (1875), 28 U.”
Orsini v. Interiors of Yesterday, LLC (In Re Interiors of Yesterday, LLC) (2002)
“The execution of any such power of attorney shall be acknowledged before one of the officers enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 459 , § 953, Rule 9012, or a person authorized to administer oaths under the laws of the state where the oath is administered.”
MacMurray v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College (1977)
“§ 1981 or 28 U.S.C. § 459 . MacMurray contends that even if the two year statute of limitations governs, his claim is not barred because it did not arise until he received notification of his termination on January 8, 1975.”
United States v. Robert Lee Looper (1969)
“§ 1 ; judges and clerks may administer oaths and affirmations, 28 U.S.C. §§ 459 , 953; and affirmations are acceptable in lieu of oaths under Rule 43(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”
United States v. Yates (2004)
“While the law generally says that the oath may be given by a justice or judge of the United States, or by the clerk of the court or his deputies, 28 U.S.C. §§ 459 , 953, this statement is not plainly sufficient to cover the anomaly presented by this case: Congress did not…”
Adair v. Bartholow (In Re Great Western Cities, Inc. of New Mexico) (1989)
“The execution of any such power of attorney shall be acknowledged before one of the officers enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 459 , § 953, Rule 9012, or a person authorized to administer oaths under the laws of the state where the oath is administered.”
O'Keith v. Johnston (1942)
“28 U.S.C.A. § 459 provides that, “When the writ is returned, a day shall be set for the hearing of the cause, not exceeding five days thereafter, unless the party petitioning requests a longer time.”
Bowen v. Johnston (1944)
“” 28 U.S.C.A. § 459 . “§ 761. The court, or justice, or judge shall proceed in a summary way to determine the facts of the case, by hearing the testimony and arguments, and thereupon to dispose of the party as law and justice require.”
Dorsey v. Gill (1945)
“28 U.S.C.A. §§ 459 , 460, 461; Walker v. Johnston, 312 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.