U.S. Code » Title 28 » Part PART I— ORGANIZATION OF COURTS › Chapter CHAPTER 23— CIVIL JUSTICE EXPENSE AND DELAY REDUCTION PLANS

28 U.S.C. § 481

Automated case information

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) The Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall ensure that each United States district court has the automated capability readily to retrieve information about the status of each case in such court.(b)(1) In carrying out subsection (a), the Director shall prescribe—(A) the information to be recorded in district court automated systems; and(B) standards for uniform categorization or characterization of judicial actions for the purpose of recording information on judicial actions in the district court automated systems.(2) The uniform standards prescribed under paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection shall include a definition of what constitutes a dismissal of a case and standards for measuring the period for which a motion has been pending.(c) Each United States district court shall record information as prescribed pursuant to subsection (b) of this section.(Added Pub. L. 101–650, title I, § 103(a), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5095.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1964–2021 · leading case: Thomas Doyle v. William Brock, Secretary, Department of Labor
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Thomas Doyle v. William Brock, Secretary, Department of Labor (1987) cadc “In the Secretary’s Supplemental Statement of Reasons, he found that, although only fifty-six members of Local 6 (3%) were qualified to run for office as a result of the application of the attendance rule, “the requirement does not violate section 401(e) of the LMRDA, 28 U.S.C. §…”
Wirtz v. Local Union No. 1622, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners (1968) cand “lection; that his protest and appeal was denied by the General President of the parent union; that having had no final decision made on his appeal to the General Executive Board of the parent union within three calendar months after instituting the same, said member filed a…”
Irving Falk, Evalene Falk, Morris Milstein and Ada Milstein v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1964) ca5 “28 U.S.C.A. § 481 . Adjustments must be made if the change in method results in items of taxable income being duplicated or omitted.”
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. JOHNSON (2021) med “” 28 U.S.C. § 481 (b)(1)(B). Pursuant to the CJRA, there are some uniform standards for determining when a pending civil action may be administratively closed.”
Solis v. Local 234, Transport Workers Union (2011) paed “The Fox Declaration asserts that the Department investigated the allegations contained in the protest, concluded that the election complied with Title IV of the Act, 28 U.S.C. § 481 et seq., and that it was conducted, insofar as lawful and practicable, in accordance with Local…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.