28 U.S.C. § 523
Requisitions
The Attorney General shall sign all requisitions for the advance or payment of moneys appropriated for the Department of Justice, out of the Treasury, subject to the same control as is exercised on like estimates or accounts by the Government Accountability Office.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1993–2024 · leading case: Corcoran v. McCabe (In re McCabe)
Corcoran v. McCabe (In re McCabe) (2018)
“The Bankruptcy Court found, inter alia , that: (1) the judgment against McCabe did not fall within the discharge exception for willful and malicious injury of 28 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(6), (2) collateral estoppel based on the CCP's judgment did not apply in its proceeding, and (3) the…”
First Federal Bank v. Mulder (In Re Mulder) (2004)
“Bank alleges also the debt should not be discharged under 28 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(2)(B) because the Mulders obtained the Bank’s agreement to extend the loan and cure the delinquency by the use of a materially false written statement as to their financial condition.”
Resare v. Resare (1993)
“First, whether the Bankruptcy Court erred in finding that Susan Resare’s interest in thirty-five percent of the pension became her sole and separate property when the final decree of divorce was entered, and therefore would not pass through the bankruptcy estate.”
Eglin Federal Credit Union v. Horlacher (In Re Horlacher) (2008)
“28 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(3)(A). This statute and the law surrounding it was the focus of the Court, based on the presentation of the parties and their motions, when it made its January 17, 2008 ruling.”
Katz v. Mondelblatt (In Re Mondelblatt) (2006)
“On January 31, 2006, Katz initiated this adversary proceeding (“the Adversary Proceeding”) by filing an adversary complaint to except from discharge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(9) any judgment he may obtain against the Debtor.”
Hoogewind v. Hendricks (In Re Hendricks) (2000)
“Conclusion For the reasons stated, the Court concludes that the debt owed by the Debtor to the Plaintiff is excepted from discharge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(5). A separate Final Judgment consistent with this memorandum opinion will be entered by the Court.”
Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz (2014)
“28 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(2). In “reviewing a bankruptcy court’s decision in a ‘core proceeding,’ a district court functions as a[n] appellate court.”
In Re Timothy Joseph Grant (2021)
“) Thereafter, the matter will be 20 returned to the Bankruptcy Court for further proceedings regarding dischargeability under 21 28 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(6). (See ECF No. 4 at 1.”
Watson v. Bradsher (2022)
“For an injury arising out of this tort to be “willful” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(6)—to show that he acted intentionally and with “the purpose .”
Ferguson Enterprises, LLC v. Blubaugh (2024)
“The Plaintiff brings this action under 28 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(2)(A) (actual fraud).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.