28 U.S.C. § 549
Expenses
Necessary office expenses of United States attorneys shall be allowed when authorized by the Attorney General.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1940–1999 · leading case: United States v. Coplon
United States v. Coplon (1950)
“425, 28 U.S.C.A. § 549 . 12 . § 3053, Title 18 U.”
Michael Lefton v. The City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi (1964)
“” Former 28 U.S.C. § 549 (1940 ed.). The present statute does not authorize fees in criminal proceedings: “The clerk of each district court shall require the parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in such court, whether by original process, removal or…”
Moses v. Kennedy (1963)
“§§ 241 , 242, 3052, 3053; 28 U.S.C. § 549 — authorize and require United States Marshals, agents of the F.”
United States v. Sotomayor Vazquez (1999)
“§ 548 ; authorize “[n]ecessary office expenses” of United States Attorneys, see 28 U.S.C. § 549 ; and approve the United States Attorneys’ hiring of “clerical assistants, messengers, and private process servers.”
Nola Electric Co. v. Reilly (1949)
“671 ; 28 U.S.C.A. § 549 , formerly § 504. The delivery of the summons and complaint to the Marshal was equivalent to a similar call upon the state sheriff to perform a like service.”
Tebbs v. Baker-Whiteley Towing Co. (1967)
“, 1957); 28 U.S.C. § 549 . The Marshal was acting as an officer of this Court in hiring the watchmen and in making the arrangements for the transfer of the vessel; in effect, he was acting on behalf of all persons having an interest therein 14 For the purposes of this case, the…”
Turkett v. United States (1948)
“28 U.S.C.A. § 549 . The authority of the clerk to charge and collect such fees is contained in 28 U.”
MacRi v. Flaherty (1953)
“164 ; 28 U.S.C.A. § 549 (formerly 504); Agnello v.”
United States v. Krapf (1960)
“” Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 549 ; Act June 25, 1948, Chap.”
Schueler v. Rayjas Enterprises, Inc. (1994)
“, 28 U.S.C. §§ 549 and 550 which establish the authority for the employment of such personnel in United States Attorneys’ offices.”
Fay v. Noia (1963)
“§ 672 , by the marshal of this Court, who is authorized by 28 U. S. C. § 549 , when acting within a State, to "exercise the same powers which a sheriff of such state may exercise in executing the laws thereof.”
Mohr v. United States (1959)
“743 , 28 U.S.C.A. § 549 * at which time the new law substituted the sum of $15 “as.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.