28 U.S.C. § 572
Renumbered § 567]
[renumbered]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases, 1931–2001 · leading case: John Whitfield v. Charles Scully, Former Supt. Gail Haponik C.O. Tornabene C.O. C. Mitchell John and Jane Does
John Whitfield v. Charles Scully, Former Supt. Gail Haponik C.O. Tornabene C.O. C. Mitchell John and Jane Does (2001)
“A district court that rules on a motion for summary judgment must “use” a filed deposition transcript to determine whether there is any genuine issue as to any material fact.”
Marks v. Calendine (1978)
“The United States Marshal is directed in 28 U.S.C. § 572 (a) to “. . . collect, as far as possible, his lawful fees .”
Ready v. Ready (1961)
“Section 218c states: “Under a few state statutes, there exists a right to an attorney’s fee where there is a trial, or a trial before a jury; and under the federal statute, 28 USCA § 572, a docket fee is taxable and allowable to attorneys on a final trial before a jury or on a…”
Matter of Estate of Nelson (1979)
“§ 218 c, states: “ ‘Under a few state statutes, there exists a right to an attorney’s fee where there is a trial, or a trial before a jury; and under the federal statute, 28 U.S.C.A. § 572 , a docket fee is taxable and allowable to attorneys on a final trial before a jury or on…”
Harris v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation (1943)
“28 U.S.C.A. § 572 , provides that there shall be allowed $2.”
Gotz v. Universal Products Co. (1943)
“The dedimus order of this court dated February 18, 1935, provided: “That each party shall pay its own counsel fees and expenses arising out of the taking of such depositions, in the initial instance, and that such costs as are taxable under the United States Statutes and Federal…”
Hubble Towing Co. v. Chas. R. McCormick Lumber Co. of Delaware (1931)
“28 USCA § 572. The libelant has contended that the decision of this court in the case of The Fair Oaks, 205 F.”
United States v. Jardine (1936)
“513 , 28 U.S.C.A. § 572 . The motion is opposed, first, because no judgment for costs can be given when a court holds itself without jurisdiction over the case, and, second, because rule 31 (4) o”E this court provides that in cases where the United States are a party no costs…”
Hill v. Whitlock Oil Services, Inc. (1971)
“§ 725v (b) and 28 U.S.C. § 572 (a). Section 1921 requires three acts: (1) seizure or levy, (2) disposition of the property by sale, setoff, or otherwise, and (3) receipt and payment of money.”
United States Ex Rel. Johnson v. Morley Const. Co. (1936)
“72 ; 28 U.S.C.A. § 572 ; Ex parte Peterson, 253 U.”
Travelers Insurance v. Lawrence (1974)
“§ 725v(b), and 28 U.S.C. § 572 (a). . The report concludes: “The Committee on the Judiciary is aware of the need to avoid raising the cost of litigation in the Federal Courts to a prohibitive level.”
Weel v. United States (1946)
“50 per witness regularly provided for in 28 U.S.C.A. § 572 . Fees to proctors allowable as costs are expressly provided for in 29 Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.