28 U.S.C. § 599

Termination of effect of chapter

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall cease to be effective five years after the date of the enactment of the Independent Counsel Reauthorization Act of 1994, except that this chapter shall continue in effect with respect to then pending matters before an independent counsel that in the judgment of such counsel require such continuation until that independent counsel determines such matters have been completed.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1893–2023 · leading case: Morrison v. Olson
Morrison v. Olson (1988) scotus · cites it 2× “" 28 U. S. C. § 599 (1982 ed., Supp. V). [2] Under 28 U.”
Riley v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital (1999) ca5 · cites it 4× “§ 594 (a) (2000), expired by 28 U.S.C. § 599 (authorizing the independent counsel to have “full power and independent authority to exercise all investigative and prosecutorial functions and powers of the Department of Justice, the Attorney General, and any other officer or…”
Michele Y. Terran, as Legal Representative of Julie F. Terran, a Minor v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (1999) cafc “, 28 U.S.C.A. § 599 (West Supp. 1999) (specifying that Title 28, Chapter 40 of the United States Code — authorizing the appointment of independent counsels— ceases to be effective five years after the date of enactment of the Independent Counsel Reauthorization Act of 1994).”
In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum (1996) ca8 “This enactment amended the sunset *1312 provision ( 28 U.S.C. § 599 ) of the 1987 Act by substituting the year 1994 for the year 1987, thereby providing for the 1987 Act to run for five years from 1994 instead of from 1987.”
United States of America v. Exactech Inc (2023) alnd “§ 594 (a), expired by 28 U.S.C. § 599 . Under that authority, the independent counsel could carry out criminal prosecutions.”
Tucker v. United States (2003) ared “Under 28 U.S.C. § 599 , the Independent Counsel was authorized to issue a Final Report.”
In Re: Grand Jury v. (1996) ca8 “This enactment amended the sunset provision ( 28 U.S.C. § 599 ) of the 1987 Act by substituting the year 1994 for the year 1987, thereby providing for the 1987 Act to run for five years from 1994 instead of from 1987.”
United States v. Hillyer (1893) ca9 “” 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 599 and note, 609. We do not so interpret the act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.