29 U.S.C. § 1361

Amounts payable by corporation

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

The corporation shall pay benefits under a single-employer plan terminated under this subchapter subject to the limitations and requirements of subtitle B of this subchapter. The corporation shall provide financial assistance to pay benefits under a multiemployer plan which is insolvent under section 1426 or 1441(d)(2)(A) of this title, subject to the limitations and requirements of subtitles B, C, and E of this subchapter. Amounts guaranteed by the corporation under sections 1322 and 1322a of this title shall be paid by the corporation only out of the appropriate fund. The corporation shall make payments under the supplemental program to reimburse multiemployer plans for uncollectible withdrawal liability only out of the fund established under section 1305(e) of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases, 1983–2015 · leading case: Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. v. White Consol. Indus., Inc., C/o Ct Corp. Sys. Registered Agent, 215 F.3d 407 (3rd Cir. 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. v. White Consol. Indus., Inc., C/o Ct Corp. Sys. Registered Agent, 215 F.3d 407 (3rd Cir. 2000). · cites it 2× “Section 1369; Treatment of Transactions to Evade Liability Section 1369(a), “Treatment of transactions to evade liability,” provides in pertinent part: If a principal purpose of any person in entering into any transaction is to evade liability to which such person would be…”

Walter I. Bechtel v. Pension Benefit Guar. Corp., 781 F.2d 906 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “29 U.S.C. § 1361 . Because the calculation of guaranteed levels of benefits after plan termination may be attended by delay, it is likely that some payments may be made at levels above those guaranteed by ERISA.”

Woodward Sand Co., Inc., & Sorrento Sand Co., Inc., Plaintiffs v. The W. Conf. of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund, 789 F.2d 691 (9th Cir. 1986). “29 U.S.C. § 1361 , et seq. This system is designed to make employers pay their share of the real cost of pensions, by paying a share of the difference between the assets already contributed and the vested benefit liability.”

Trujillo v. Schweiker, 558 F. Supp. 1058 (D. Colo. 1983). “§ 1383 (c)(3), 29 U.S.C. § 1361 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202.”

In Re Divco Philadelphia Sales Corp., 60 B.R. 323 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1986). “29 U.S.C. § 1361 . In order to finance the guaranteed benefit payments, the Pension Fund collects insurance premiums from ongoing covered pension plans.”

Mason Tenders Dist. Council Welfare Fund v. Dalton, 648 F. Supp. 1309 (S.D.N.Y. 1986). “See 29 U.S.C. § 1361 . The legislative history marshaled above reveals the force of Congress’ desire to encourage the growth and maintenance of multi-employer plans.”

In Re Divco Philadelphia Sales Corp., 64 B.R. 232 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1986). “29 U.S.C. § 1361 . In order to finance the guaranteed benefit payments, the Pension Fund collects insurance premiums from ongoing pension plans.”

Carpenters Pension Trust Fund v. Walker, 78 F. Supp. 3d 1035 (N.D. Cal. 2015). “Walker, the Keith Walker Trusts, and the Real Estate Leasing Business are all part of a control group that incurred withdrawal liability under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1361 et seq., when Walker’s business Rollie French, Inc.”

Bd. of Trs. v. Thompson Bldg. Materials, Inc., 749 F.2d 1390 (9th Cir. 1984). “29 U.S.C. § 1361 . 1 The PBGC could recover amounts it expended in proportionate shares from the employers, provided certain contingencies were met.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.