29 U.S.C. § 156
Rules and regulations
The Board shall have authority from time to time to make, amend, and rescind, in the manner prescribed by subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this subchapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 95
cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1938–2026 · leading case: National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.
National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co. (1974)
“Rather, the Board should conduct a rulemaking proceeding in conformity with § 6 of the Act, 29 U. S. C. § 156 . The court therefore remanded the case to the Board for such a proceeding.”
National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co. (1969)
“" 29 U. S. C. § 156 . The Administrative Procedure Act contains specific provisions governing agency rule making, which it defines as "an agency statement of general or particular applicability and future *764 effect," 5 U.”
National Labor Relations Board v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co. (1978)
“29 U. S. C. § 156 , commits the formulation of discovery practice to its *237 discretion has generally been sustained by the lower courts.”
Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young (2016)
“2 The Board has both rulemaking and adjudicative powers, 29 U.S.C. § 156 , § 160, and it may authoritatively interpret the NLRA through either process.”
National Ass'n of Manufacturers v. National Labor Relations Board (2013)
“29 U.S.C. § 156 . The Board thought the rule was necessary because employees were not aware of their rights under the Act.”
National Labor Relations Board v. Financial Institution Employees, Local 1182 (1986)
“324, 330 (1946); see also 29 U. S. C. § 156 ; NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co.”
Shapiro v. United States (1948)
“National Labor Relations Act, 1935 [ 29 U.S.C. §§ 156 , 161]. Social Security Act, 1935 [ 42 U.”
San Diego Teachers Assn. v. Superior Court (1979)
“§§ 153 (b), 159) and can investigate, adjudicate, and issue orders against unfair practices (§§ 3541.”
Osthus v. Whitesell Corp. (2011)
“The Board assigned this authority to its regional directors, pursuant to the Board's rulemaking authority, see 29 U.S.C. § 156 ; 29 C.F.R. § 202.35 (Supp.”
American Hospital Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board (1991)
“See 29 U. S. C. § 156 . The question whether the Board has changed its view about *619 certain issues or certain industries does not undermine the validity of a rule that is based on substantial evidence and supported by a “reasoned analysis.”
National Petroleum Refiners Ass'n v. Federal Trade Commission (1973)
“And Wyman-Gordon assumed that the NLRB also had substantive rule-making powers under 29 U.S.C. § 156 (1970). 394 U.S. at 763 -765 & n.”
Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC (2020)
“392 , 398– 99 (1996) (statutory grant in the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 156 , grants the National Labor Relations Board “authority from time to time to make, amend, and rescind, in the manner prescribed by [the Administrative Procedure Act], such rules and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.