29 U.S.C. § 175
National Labor-Management Panel; creation and composition; appointment, tenure, and compensation; duties
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1987–2025 · leading case: Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd.
Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd. (2010)
“§780 experience) National Labor- Yes Management Panel Yes (related 29 U. S. C. §175 knowledge) —————— † See Lebron, supra.”
Hoke Co., Inc. v. Tennessee Valley Authority (1987)
“, 29 U.S.C. § 175 (National Labor Relations Act); 42 U.”
International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators Local 17 Pension Fund v. CEC Environmental, Inc. (2021)
“¶¶ 4, 14; 29 U.S.C. § 175 (a). On June 4, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a two-count Complaint against CEC and Celtic.”
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND v. BAYSIDE ELEVATORS LLC (2025)
“§ 186 (c)(9), and in Section 6 of the Labor-Management Cooperation Act of 1978, 29 U.S.C. § 175 (a). 2 contribution rate in the CBA to determine the total amount owed by the employer for a specific month.”
Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd. (2010)
“§780 experience) National Labor- Yes Management Panel Yes (related 29 U. S. C. §175 knowledge) —————— † See Lebron, supra.”
Helix Electric Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (2006)
“Helix maintained that: (1) PWCP was not a valid LMC; (2) the *815 function of PWCP exceeds the permissible purposes of an LMC, as provided in 29 U.S.C. § 175 ; (3) California Labor Code § 1776(e) is preempted by federal labor law; and § 1776(e) violates the Fourteenth…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.