29 U.S.C. § 627

Notices to be posted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

Every employer, employment agency, and labor organization shall post and keep posted in conspicuous places upon its premises a notice to be prepared or approved by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission setting forth information as the Commission deems appropriate to effectuate the purposes of this chapter.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 97 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1974–2023 · leading case: George L. CHARLIER & George B. Russell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. S. C. JOHNSON & SON, INC., Defendant-Appellee, 556 F.2d 761 (5th Cir. 1977).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

George L. CHARLIER & George B. Russell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. S. C. JOHNSON & SON, INC., Defendant-Appellee, 556 F.2d 761 (5th Cir. 1977). · cites it 5× “We hold that defendant’s notice, posted in its regional Houston, Texas office, designed to inform its employees of their ADEA rights and comply with 29 U.S.C. § 627 and 29 C.F.R. § 850.10 (1976), was insufficient to provide Charlier, who lived and worked in Central Texas and…”

Philip J. Podobnik v. United States Postal Serv. Nat'l Rural Letter Carriers Ass'n John E. Potter, Postmaster Gen. of the United States, 409 F.3d 584 (3rd Cir. 2005). “9 While it is true that all employers must conspicuously post a notice to be prepared or approved by the EEOC setting forth information regarding the ADEA, 29 U.S.C. § 627 , it is also true that failure to post the required notice will toll the running of the 180-day period…”

Joel T. McClinton v. Alabama By-Prods. Corp. & Ralph Stuckey, 743 F.2d 1483 (11th Cir. 1984). · cites it 3× “In this case, appellant asserts that equitable tolling is appropriate in light of Alabama-By-Products’ failure to post conspicuous notice of ADEA rights (as required by 29 U.S.C. § 627 1 ), which deprived him of the opportunity to discover his specific rights under the ADEA.”

Anne M. DARTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHELL OIL Co., Defendant-Appellee, 539 F.2d 1256 (10th Cir. 1976). · cites it 2× “Finally, even though Congress inserted a requirement that employers must post such information pertaining to the ADEA “as the Secretary [of Labor] deems appropriate to effectuate the purposes of [the Act],” 29 U.S.C. § 627 , such notice posted by Shell, even though provided by…”

Chamber of Com. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 721 F.3d 152 (4th Cir. 2013). · cites it 3× “§ 2000e-10(a); Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 627 ; Occupational Safety & Health Act, 29 U.”

Wanda Rose DeBRUNNER, Appellant, v. MIDWAY Equip. CO., Appellee, 803 F.2d 950 (8th Cir. 1986). · cites it 3× “It is undisputed that Midway failed to post notice concerning equal employment rights as required by 29 U.S.C. § 627 . 2 However, prior to her discharge, on March 24, 1982, DeBrunner went to the offices of the EEOC to complain about Midway’s failure to train her on the computer…”

Less v. Nestle Co., Inc., 705 F. Supp. 110 (W.D.N.Y. 1988). · cites it 4× “In response, plaintiff contends that the statute of limitations was tolled due to the failure of defendant to properly post notice under 29 U.S.C. § 627 , and that, since the discriminatory practice was ongoing, violations occurring outside the limitations period (including the…”

Edward R. POSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYLINE Corp., Defendant-Appellee, 702 F.2d 102 (7th Cir. 1983). “29 U.S.C. § 627 . . The notice posted at Skyline stated in part that: “If you wish to file your own suit, you must do so within prescribed time limits.”

East v. Graphic Arts Indus. Jt. Pension Trust, 718 A.2d 153 (D.C. 1998). · cites it 2× “29 U.S.C. § 627 (1994); 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-10 (1994).”

Emra Joseph Bonham v. Dresser Indus., Inc., a Corp., 569 F.2d 187 (3rd Cir. 1978). “Title 29 U.S.C. § 627 provides: Every employer .”

Carl Kale v. Combined Ins. Co. of Am., Carl Kale v. Combined Ins. Co. of Am., 861 F.2d 746 (1st Cir. 1988). “29 U.S.C. § 627 . Whether this court might think it helpful to prospective plaintiffs to have the filing deadline mentioned in the notices is immaterial.”

Glass v. IDS Fin. Servs., Inc., 778 F. Supp. 1029 (D. Minnesota 1991). · cites it 2× “Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Equitable Tolling Plaintiffs urge the court to equitably toll the ADEA statute of limitations because IDS allegedly failed to post notices informing employees of their rights under the ADEA, in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 627 . 19…”

Show all 97 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.