29 U.S.C. § 706

Allotment percentage

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)(1) For purposes of section 730 of this title, the allotment percentage for any State shall be 100 per centum less that percentage which bears the same ratio to 50 per centum as the per capita income of such State bears to the per capita income of the United States, except that—(A) the allotment percentage shall in no case be more than 75 per centum or less than 33⅓ per centum; and(B) the allotment percentage for the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands shall be 75 per centum.(2) The allotment percentages shall be promulgated by the Secretary of Education between October 1 and December 31 of each even-numbered year, on the basis of the average of the per capita incomes of the States and of the United States for the three most recent consecutive years for which satisfactory data are available from the Department of Commerce. Such promulgation shall be conclusive for each of the 2 fiscal years in the period beginning on the October 1 next succeeding such promulgation.(3) The term “United States” means (but only for purposes of this subsection) the 50 States and the District of Columbia.(b) The population of the several States and of the United States shall be determined on the basis of the most recent data available, to be furnished by the Department of Commerce by October 1 of the year preceding the fiscal year for which funds are appropriated pursuant to statutory authorizations.(Pub. L. 93–112, § 8, formerly § 7, as added Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, § 403, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1110; renumbered § 8, Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, § 101(f) [title VIII, § 402(a)(1)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–412; amended Pub. L. 113–128, title IV, § 405(a), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1637.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in section 707 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220.

A prior section 706, Pub. L. 93–112, § 7, Sept. 26, 1973, 87 Stat. 359; Pub. L. 93–516, title I, § 111(a), Dec. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1619; Pub. L. 93–651, title I, § 111(a), Nov. 21, 1974, 89 Stat. 2–5; Pub. L. 95–602, title I, § 122(a)(4)–(8), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2984, 2985; Pub. L. 98–221, title I, § 101, Feb. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 17; Pub. L. 99–506, title I, § 103(a), (b), (c)(1), (d)(1), (2)(A), (C), (e)–(h)(1), (i), (j), title X, §§ 1001(a)(3), 1002(a), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1809–1811, 1841, 1844; Pub. L. 99–514, § 2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095; Pub. L. 100–259, § 9, Mar. 22, 1988, 102 Stat. 31; Pub. L. 100–630, title II, § 201(c), Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3303; Pub. L. 101–336, title V, § 513, formerly § 512, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 376, renumbered § 513, Pub. L. 110–325, § 6(a)(2), Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3558; Pub. L. 102–569, title I, § 102(a)–(n), (p)(3), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4347–4350, 4356; Pub. L. 103–73, title I, §§ 102(1), 103, Aug. 11, 1993, 107 Stat. 718; Pub. L. 103–218, title IV, § 404, Mar. 9, 1994, 108 Stat. 97, defined terms for purposes of this chapter, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, § 403, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1093. See section 705 of this title.

A prior section 8 of Pub. L. 93–112 was renumbered section 10 and is classified to section 707 of this title.

Another prior section 8 of Pub. L. 93–112 was classified to section 707 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220.

Amendments

2014—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 113–128 inserted “of Education” after “Secretary”.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 605 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case: Sch. Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 (1987).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Sch. Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 (1987). · cites it 10× “" 29 U. S. C. § 706 (7)(B). The amended definition reflected Congress' concern with protecting the handicapped against discrimination stemming not only from simple prejudice, but also from "archaic attitudes and laws" and from "the fact that the American people are simply…”

Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U.S. 624 (1998). · cites it 4× “In construing the statute, we are informed by interpretations of parallel definitions in previous statutes and the views of various administrative agencies which have faced this interpretive question. A The ADA's definition of disability is drawn almost verbatim from the…”

Thomas Jasany v. United States Postal Serv., 755 F.2d 1244 (6th Cir. 1985). · cites it 4× “” 29 U.S.C. § 706 (7)(B)(i) (emphasis added).”

New York City Transit Auth. v. Beazer, 440 U.S. 568 (1979). · cites it 3× “In relevant part, § 7 (6) of the Act, 29 U. S. C. § 706 (6), as amended and redesignated, 92 Stat.”

E. E. Black, Ltd. v. Marshall, 497 F. Supp. 1088 (D. Haw. 1980). · cites it 6× “29 U.S.C. § 706 (7) (Supp. III 1979) reads in pertinent part: (A) Except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (B), the term “handicapped individual” means any individual who (i) has a physical or mental disability which for such individual constitutes or results in a…”

Mary Ellen Byrne v. Bd. of Educ., Sch. of West Allis-West Milwaukee, 979 F.2d 560 (7th Cir. 1992). · cites it 4× “29 U.S.C. § 706 (8)(B); 1 45 C.F.R. § 84 .”

Lyle S. Chandler & Adolphus A. Maddox, on Behalf of Themselves & Others Similarly Situated v. The City of Dallas, the City of Dallas, 2 F.3d 1385 (5th Cir. 1993). · cites it 3× “29 U.S.C.S. § 706 (8)(B) (1990). 12 . School Board of Nassau Co.”

Pridemore v. Rural Legal Aid Soc. of W. Cent. Ohio, 625 F. Supp. 1180 (S.D. Ohio 1985). · cites it 11× “§ 706 (7)(B), which provides that a “handicapped individual” is one who (i) has a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person’s major life activities, (ii) has a record of such an impairment, or (iii) is regarded as having such an…”

Scot L. Zimmerman v. State of Oregon Dep't of Just., 170 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir. 1999). · cites it 3× “In turn, 29 U.S.C. § 706 (7) defines that term solely in relation to employment.”

Doe v. Dist. of Columbia, 796 F. Supp. 559 (D.D.C. 1992). · cites it 5× “Defendant District of Columbia (the District) is a municipality that is treated as a state for the purposes of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 706 (14) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 .”

Deborah Shafer v. Preston Mem'l Hosp. Corp. Victoria Adams, 107 F.3d 274 (4th Cir. 1997). · cites it 4× “§ 12114 (a) (West 1995) (ADA); accord 29 U.S.C.A. § 706 (8)(C)(i) (West Supp.1996) (Rehabilitation Act).”

John A. Francis v. City of Meriden, 129 F.3d 281 (2d Cir. 1997). · cites it 3× “§ 12102 (2)(ADA); 29 U.S.C. § 706 (8)(B)(RHA). “Major life activities” are defined in the regulations as “functions such as caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, and working.”

Show all 605 citing cases →

— 29 U.S.C. § 706(7) — 3 cases

Quaker Hill Place v. State Human Relations Comm'n, 498 A.2d 175 (Del. Super. Ct. 1985).

EVA N. v. Brock, 741 F. Supp. 626 (E.D. Ky. 1990).

Brown v. Am. Home Prods. Corp., 520 F. Supp. 1120 (D. Kan. 1981).

— 29 U.S.C. § 706(8) — 4 cases

Nicholas Knapp v. Nw. Univ., an Illinois Not-For-Profit Corp., & Rick Taylor, 101 F.3d 473 (7th Cir. 1997).

Francis v. Runyon, 928 F. Supp. 195 (E.D.N.Y 1996).

Cnty. of San Diego v. Brown, 19 Cal. App. 4th 1054 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993).

Bercovitch v. Baldwin Sch. (1st Cir. 1998).

— 29 U.S.C. § 706(8)(B) — 1 case

Judy Lavonne Crewe v. United States Off. of Pers. Mgmt., Naci Ctr. for Pers. Investigations, Boyers, Pa., 834 F.2d 140 (8th Cir. 1988).

— 29 U.S.C. § 706(8)(C)(i) — 1 case

Deborah Shafer v. Preston Mem'l Hosp. Corp. Victoria Adams, 107 F.3d 274 (4th Cir. 1997). “§ 12114 (a) (West 1995) (ADA); accord 29 U.S.C.A. § 706 (8)(C)(i) (West Supp.1996) (Rehabilitation Act).”

— 29 U.S.C. § 706(8)(c)(v) — 1 case

Evans v. Fed. Express (1st Cir. 1998).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.