30 U.S.C. § 1307
Water rights and replacement
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1982–2001 · leading case: Rose v. Oneida Coal Co., Inc.
Rose v. Oneida Coal Co., Inc. (1995)
“The plaintiffs appear to concede that at the time the surface water damage occurred, the federal provision which is in 30 U.S.C. § 1307 (1977) of the SMCRA 10 did not apply to underground mining as determined in National Wildlife Federation v.”
In Re Permanent Surface Mining Regulation Litigation (1985)
“43991 (1983), which mirrors § 717, 30 U.S.C. § 1307 of SMCRA, and requires replacement of water supplies that have been adversely affected by surface mining operations, claiming that to the extent it would require mining operators with senior water rights to replace the water…”
Antco, Inc. v. Dodge Fuel Corp. (2001)
“Code, 22A-3-24(b), of the WVSCMRA nor its federal counterpart in 30 U.S.C. § 1307 of the SMCRA relating to the replacement of surface water, is applicable to the operation of an underground coal mine.”
Schultz v. Consolidation Coal Co. (1996)
“Code, 22-3-24 (1994)], nor its federal counterpart in 30 U.S.C. § 1307 of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act relating to the replacement of surface water, is applicable to the operation of an underground coal mine.”
Wiggins v. Brazil Coal and Clay Corp. (1983)
“As required by the federal Surface Mining Act, Indiana has adopted the language of 30 U.S.C. § 1307 concerning water rights and replacements.”
Wiggins v. Brazil Coal and Clay Corp. (1982)
“30 U.S.C. § 1307 . The successor trial judge, ruling on the motion to correct errors, held that he had no jurisdiction to enforce this provision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.