30 U.S.C. § 956

Applicability of administrative procedure provisions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 30 CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, the provisions of sections 551 to 559 and sections 701 to 706 of title 5 shall not apply to the making of any order, notice, or decision made pursuant to this chapter, or to any proceeding for the review thereof.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1983–2023 · leading case: Pendley v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 601 F.3d 417 (6th Cir. 2010).
Pendley v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 601 F.3d 417 (6th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “Standard of Review The standard under which this Court reviews the Commission's order is governed by the Mine Act and general administrative law principles, although the Administrative Procedure Act's judicial review provisions do not apply here, 30 U.S.C. § 956 . This Court…”
Mann Constr., Inc. v. United States, 27 F.4th 1138 (6th Cir. 2022). “1995) (quoting 30 U.S.C. § 956 ). In still another case, the D.”
Sec'y of Labor v. Twentymile Coal Co., 456 F.3d 151 (D.C. Cir. 2006). “” 30 U.S.C. § 956 . Contrary to the view of the Commission, however, the fact that § 701(a)(2) itself is inapplicable does not mean that the principles underlying it are also inapplicable.”
Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Chao, 160 F. Supp. 2d 47 (D.D.C. 2001). · cites it 3× “30 U.S.C. § 956 . 8 The BLBA then incorporates certain sections of the Longshore Act.”
Noranda Alumina, L.L.C. v. Fed Mine Sfty & Hlth Re, 841 F.3d 661 (5th Cir. 2016). “30 U.S.C. § 956 ; see also Pendley, 601 F.”
Speed Mining, Inc. v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 528 F.3d 310 (4th Cir. 2008). “Thus, the fact that the Mine Act states that sections 701 to 706 of the APA "shall not apply” to any Mine Act review proceedings, 30 U.S.C. § 956 (2000), does not preclude the "committed to agency discretion” exception from applying in this case.”
Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co. v. Raymond J. Donovan, Sec'y of Labor, 713 F.2d 1243 (6th Cir. 1983). “30 U.S.C. § 956 . Moreover, later authority indicates that Abbott Laboratories “arguably assumed with little discussion that the APA is an independent grant of subject matters jurisdiction.”
Oil, Chem. & Atomic Workers Int'l Union v. Zegeer, 768 F.2d 1480 (D.C. Cir. 1985). · cites it 3× “Second, MSHA and AMC call our attention to 30 U.S.C. § 956 , which provides that the APA ( 5 U.”
KenAmerican Res., Inc. v. U.S. Sec'y of Labor, 33 F.4th 884 (6th Cir. 2022). ““The standard under which this Court reviews the Commission’s order is governed by the Mine Safety Act and general administrative law principles, although the Administrative Procedure Act’s judicial review provisions do not apply here, 30 U.S.C. § 956 .” Pendley, 601 F.3d at 422…”
Robert B. Reich, Sec'y, United States Dep't of Labor v. The Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co., 66 F.3d 111 (6th Cir. 1995). “30 U.S.C. § 956 . 3 . The regulations do not detail what, if anything, this initial notice to the operator must provide, other than to inform the operator of "the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the authorized providers of medical benefits chosen by an entitled miner.”
Cactus Canyon Quarries v. MSHR, 64 F.4th 662 (5th Cir. 2023). “3 Cactus Canyon’s contention that it was denied due process because of the ALJ’s evidentiary errors accordingly fails.”
Cactus Canyon Quarries v. MSHR (5th Cir. 2023). “3 Cactus Canyon’s contention that it was denied due process because of the ALJ’s evidentiary errors accordingly fails.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.