33 U.S.C. § 1261
Scholarships
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1993–2003 · leading case: Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (2001)
“817 , as amended, 33 U. S. C. §1261 et seq., commonly known as the Clean Water Act (Clean Water Act, CWA, or Act).”
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. City of New York (2001)
“On November 20, 1998, Catskill sent a letter to the City, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), and the New York State Department of Conservation (“NYSDEC”), indicating Catskill’s intention to file suit in district court under the federal Clean Water Act…”
Georgia River Network v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2003)
“See 33 U.S.C. § 1261 (g). E. Indirect Impacts from the Reservoir Whether the Corps can consider the indirect growth related impacts of the Reservoir is the subject of HCA’s motion to dismiss.”
Alameda Water & Sanitation District v. Reilly (1996)
“816 , as amended, now codified in 33 U.S.C. § 1261 (a). The application for a permit for the Two Forks dam was submitted on March 4,1986.”
Greenpeace, Inc. v. Waste Technologies Industries (1993)
“, and 33 U.S.C. §§ 1261 et seq., respectively, the administration of which has been delegated by the U.”
Puerto Rico Ex Rel. Secretary of Justice v. Rumsfeld (2002)
“This omission is significant, in light of the fact that Congress has provided explicit enforcement language in the federal facility provisions of other environmental statutes considered analogous to the Noise Control Act. For example, the federal facility provisions of both the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.