33 U.S.C. § 1414
DEFINITIONS.
“The portion of each such geodesic situated beyond three nautical miles from the baseline from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured forms the outer limit of the waters of the Alexander Archipelago in those five locations.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1980–1994 · leading case: Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Douglas M. Costle, in His Off. Capacity as Adm'r, Env't Prot. Agency (Ocean Dumping), 629 F.2d 118 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Douglas M. Costle, in His Off. Capacity as Adm'r, Env't Prot. Agency (Ocean Dumping), 629 F.2d 118 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “§ 104(a), 33 U.S.C. § 1414 (a) (1976). 11 . Id. § 104(d), 33 U.”
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 824 F.2d 1258 (1st Cir. 1987). “The HLW environmental standards do not apply to disposal in or below the ocean since ocean disposal is prohibited by the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, 33 U.S.C. § 1414 (1982). Also, the environmental standards do not apply to radioactive wastes that…”
United States v. City of New York, 799 F. Supp. 1308 (E.D.N.Y 1992). “In accordance with the Ocean Dumping Ban Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1414 , the United States, the State of New York, and the City of New York entered into a consent decree and enforcement agreement ("Consent Decree”) which required the City to phase out and terminate ocean dumping of…”
Clean Ocean Action v. York, 861 F. Supp. 1203 (D.N.J. 1994). “” This is consistent with the statute under which the EPA is given discretion to establish and revise the criteria to be used in determining whether to grant a permit for ocean dumping, 33 U.S.C. § 1413 (b), and either EPA or the Corps is given discretion to require information…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.