U.S. Code » Title 38 » Part PART II— GENERAL BENEFITS › Chapter CHAPTER 17— HOSPITAL, NURSING HOME, DOMICILIARY, AND MEDICAL CARE › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— GENERAL › Subtitle “Subtitle B— Patient Advocacy

38 U.S.C. § 921

COMMUNITY MEETINGS ON IMPROVING CARE FURNISHED BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 38 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)Community Meetings.—“(1)Medical centers.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 22, 2016], and not less frequently than once every 90 days thereafter, the Secretary shall ensure that each medical facility of the Department of Veterans Affairs hosts a community meeting open to the public on improving health care furnished by the Secretary.“(2)Community-based outpatient clinics.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and not less frequently than annually thereafter, the Secretary shall ensure that each community-based outpatient clinic of the Department hosts a community meeting open to the public on improving health care furnished by the Secretary.“(b)Attendance by Director of Veterans Integrated Service Network or Designee.—“(1)In general.—Each community meeting hosted by a medical facility or community-based outpatient clinic under subsection (a) shall be attended by the Director of the Veterans Integrated Service Network in which the medical facility or community-based outpatient clinic, as the case may be, is located. Subject to paragraph (2), the Director may delegate such attendance only to an employee who works in the Office of the Director.“(2)Attendance by director.—Each Director of a Veterans Integrated Service Network shall personally attend not less than one community meeting under subsection (a) hosted by each medical facility located in the Veterans Integrated Service Network each year.“(c)Notice.—The Secretary shall notify the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate, the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives, and each Member of Congress (as defined in section 902) [sic] who represents the area in which the medical facility is located of a community meeting under subsection (a) by not later than 10 days before such community meeting occurs.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1987–2013 · leading case: Labelle Processing Co. v. John Swarrow & Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 72 F.3d 308 (3rd Cir. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Labelle Processing Co. v. John Swarrow & Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 72 F.3d 308 (3rd Cir. 1996). “102(6); see also 38 U.S.C. § 921 (b); 20 C.F.R. § 801.101 -.”
Murphy v. Murphy, 510 N.E.2d 235 (Ind. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “All of the administrative proceedings took place under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. Under the Act, a compensation order becomes final thirty (80) days after filing with the deputy commissioner's office "unless proceedings for the suspension or setting…”
B & D Contracting v. Pearley, 548 F.3d 338 (5th Cir. 2008). “38 U.S.C. § 921 (c). Here, the claimant’s injury occurred in Avondale, Louisiana.”
Hill v. Dir. , Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 562 F.3d 264 (3rd Cir. 2009). “JURISDICTION AND STANDARD OF REVIEW We have jurisdiction to review the Board’s determination pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 921 (c). The Board is bound by the ALJ’s findings of fact if they are supported by substantial evidence.”
Sisson v. Davis & Sons, Inc., 131 F.3d 555 (5th Cir. 1998). “38 U.S.C. § 921 (b)(3); Munguia v. Chevron U.”
Jeffboat, Inc. v. Robert Mann, & Dir., Off. of Workers Comp. Prog., United States Dep't of Labor, 875 F.2d 660 (7th Cir. 1989). “We have jurisdiction under 38 U.S.C. § 921 (c). According to § 921(a) of the Longshore Act, an AU’s order becomes effective when it is “filed” in the Deputy Commissioner’s office “as provided in § 919” of that title, and, unless proceedings for the suspension or setting aside of…”
Snowden v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 253 F.3d 725 (D.C. Cir. 2001). “38 U.S.C. § 921 (a). Until that time, the Board has jurisdiction to “determine appeals raising a substantial question of law or fact taken by any party in interest from decisions with respect to claims of employees.”
Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 81 F.3d 561 (5th Cir. 1996). “The Board held that Ingalls lacked standing under 38 U.S.C. § 921 (c) to seek review of the decision and that the issues presented by Ingalls were not ripe for adjudication.”
Bernice Van Dyke v. Missouri Mining, Inc, 78 F.3d 362 (8th Cir. 1996). “Van Dyke’s petition for review of the BRB’s 1995 decision therefore authorizes our jurisdiction over the proceeding pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 921 (c). Although our review arises from the BRB’s 1995 order, we are entitled to look at the entire record in determining whether the BRB…”
Gindville v. Dir., Off. of Workers Comp. Programs, 524 F. App'x 784 (3rd Cir. 2013). “§ 919 , and the jurisdiction of the Board to hear and determine appeals of the decision of the ALJ arose under 38 U.S.C. § 921 (b). Pursuant to 33 U.S.C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.