42 U.S.C. § 11421

Repealed. Pub. L. 105–220, title I, § 199(b)(1), Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1059

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1994–2005 · leading case: Brenda Lampkin, as Legal Guardian of Jessica Lampkin & Christine Lampkin, Minors v. Dist. of Columbia, a Mun. Corp., 27 F.3d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1994).
Brenda Lampkin, as Legal Guardian of Jessica Lampkin & Christine Lampkin, Minors v. Dist. of Columbia, a Mun. Corp., 27 F.3d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “42 U.S.C. § 11421 (d) (1988). They filed this action in the district court pursuant to 42 U.”
Sylvia's Haven, Inc. v. Massachusetts Dev. Fin. Agency, 397 F. Supp. 2d 202 (D. Mass. 2005). · cites it 2× “Title 42 U.S.C. § 11421 (Repealed 1998). This subtitle of the Act authorized the Secretary of Education to make grants to States so the States could create literacy training plans that could include nonprofit organizations.”
Lampkin v. Dist. of Columbia, 886 F. Supp. 56 (D.D.C. 1995). “The District of Columbia is included as a “State” pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 11421 (d). Quite clearly, the Act is meant to apply only to those states that receive grants.”
Lampkin v. Dist. of Columbia, 879 F. Supp. 116 (D.D.C. 1995). “For purposes of the Act, the District of Columbia is considered to be a state, *122 42 U.S.C. § 11421 (d) (1988), and by accepting federal funds, the District assumed the obligation to comply with the Act’s requirements.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.