42 U.S.C. § 12132
Discrimination
Subject to the provisions of this subchapter, no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4,626
cases (2,013 in the last 5 years), 1991–2026 · leading case: Nicole Haberle v. Daniel Troxell
Nicole Haberle v. Daniel Troxell (2018)
“20 (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 12132 ).) A municipality’s failure to train its police is not actionable unless and until that failure leads directly to a denial of a needed accommodation or improper discrimination.”
Jill Babcock v. State of Mich. (2016)
“Defendants maintain that no conduct violated Title II because Babcock’s complaint fails to name a public service, program, or activity from which she was excluded or denied benefits. Babcock responds that her exclusion from equal access to Cadillac Place is sufficient to violate…”
Olmstead v. L.C. (1999)
“337 , 42 U. S. C. § 12132 . Specifically, we confront the question whether the proscription of discrimination may require placement of persons with mental disabilities in community settings rather than in institutions.”
Henrietta D. v. Bloomberg (2003)
“” 42 U.S.C. § 12132 . Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act similarly provides that “[n]o otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States .”
Frame v. City of Arlington (2011)
“Specifically, Title II, 42 U.S.C. § 12132 , provides that "no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to…”
Gohl Ex Rel. J.G. v. Livonia Public Schools School District (2016)
“” 42 U.S.C. § 12132 . Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act provides that a qualified individual with a disability shall not, “solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any…”
Mary Jo C. v. New York State and Local Retirement System et ano. (2013)
“877 (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 12132 ). The statute “require[s] that covered entities make reasonable accommodations in order to provide qualified individuals with an equal opportunity to receive benefits from or to participate in programs run by such entities.”
Shotz v. City of Plantation, FL (2003)
“§ 12112 (a) (“covered entity”); 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (“public entity”); 42 U.”
Frame v. City of Arlington (2009)
“Title II provides that "no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity.”
M.R. v. Dreyfus (2011)
“Plaintiffs argue principally that the regulation violates the antidiscrimination provisions of the Americans with Disabili- ties Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12132 , and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.”
Joe Houston v. Marod Supermarkets, Inc. (2013)
“42 U.S.C. § 12132 . The Tenth Circuit in Tandy observed that § 12132 of Title II includes language substantially similar to FHA § 804(d), which the Supreme Court analyzed in Havens Realty.”
Scot L. Zimmerman v. State of Oregon Department of Justice (1999)
“42 U.S.C. § 12132 . The term “public entity” means “any State or local government” or “any department, agency, special purpose district, or other instrumentality of a State or States or local government.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.