U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 136— VIOLENT CRIME CONTROL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— PRISONS › Part Part A— Violent Offender Incarceration and Truth-in-Sentencing Incentive Grants

42 U.S.C. § 13703

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1998–2003 · leading case: Winklespecht v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Winklespecht v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole (2002) pa · cites it 2× “[5] NOTES [1] In his habeas petition, Winklespecht also argued that an intervening federal law, the Federal Violent Offenders Truth in Sentencing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 13703 , and changes in unspecified Parole Board guidelines violated the ex post facto clause.”
Serino v. State (2003) ind “§ 18704 (2002) (lists eligibility and exceptions for "Truth-in-Sentencing" incentive grants); see also 42 U.S.C. § 13703 (2002) (applies "Truth, in-sentencing" law to violent offender incarceration).”
Stewart v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole (1998) pacommwct · cites it 3× “42 U.S.C. § 13703 (a). In addition, there are additional grant monies available to states that can demonstrate an increased percentage of persons sentenced and time served, 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.